
GeForce9400M vs GeForce 6800

GeForce9400M
Popular choices:

GeForce 6800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce9400M is positioned at rank 630 and the GeForce 6800 is on rank 726, so the GeForce9400M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce9400M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 6800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 6800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce9400M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce9400M | GeForce 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+6.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 6800 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce9400M and GeForce 6800

GeForce9400M
The GeForce9400M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 106 points.

GeForce 6800
The GeForce 6800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 113 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce9400M scores 106 versus the GeForce 6800's 113 — the GeForce 6800 leads by 6.6%. The GeForce9400M is built on Maxwell while the GeForce 6800 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce9400M) vs 256 (GeForce 6800). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce9400M) vs 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 6800). Boost clocks: 1176 MHz vs 1150 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce9400M | GeForce 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 106 | 113+7% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+50% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9032 TFLOPS+53% | 0.5888 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1176 MHz+2% | 1150 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24+50% | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+50% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce9400M | GeForce 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce9400M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 6800 has 256 MB. The GeForce9400M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce9400M | GeForce 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce9400M) vs 9.0c (GeForce 6800). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce9400M | GeForce 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0)+23% | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 3.3+57% | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No NVENC (Tesla) (GeForce9400M) vs None (GeForce 6800). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs PureVideo (VP1). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce9400M) vs MPEG-2,WMV (GeForce 6800).
| Feature | GeForce9400M | GeForce 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No NVENC (Tesla) | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP3 | PureVideo (VP1) |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,WMV |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce9400M draws 33W versus the GeForce 6800's 33W — a 0% difference. The GeForce 6800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce9400M) vs 350W (GeForce 6800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce9400M | GeForce 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W | 33W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 198mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 3.2 | 3.4+6% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce9400M is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce9400M | GeForce 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $299 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $50 |
| Codename | GM108 | GM108 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | July 22 2014 |
| Ranking | #847 | #832 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















