GeForce9400M
VS
Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi

GeForce9400M vs Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi

NVIDIA

GeForce9400M

2015Core: 1072 MHzBoost: 1176 MHz
VS
AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi

2009Core: 550 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce9400M is positioned at rank 630 and the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi is on rank 626, so the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce9400M

#620
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
5026%
#622
4556%
#623
4544%
#627
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
4132%
#628
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
4104%
#630
GeForce9400M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#631
Mobility Radeon X1700
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
99%
#632
GeForce 9800 GTX+
MSRP: $229|Avg: $50
99%
#633
Mobility Radeon HD 560v
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
98%
#634
GeForce 9300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $20
98%
#635
Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU
MSRP: $899|Avg: $400
97%
#636
GeForce 8400M G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
97%
#637
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
96%
#638
GeForce 8400M GS
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
96%
#639
GeForce 9100
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
95%
#640
GeForce 9600M GT
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
94%
#641
GeForce 8300
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
94%
#642
Mobility Radeon HD 3430
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
93%
#643
92%
#644
GeForce 9500 GS
MSRP: $110|Avg: $10
91%
#645
GeForce 9300GE
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi

#616
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
4783%
#618
4336%
#619
4324%
#623
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
3932%
#624
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
3905%
#626
100%
#627
99%
#628
GeForce 9500M GS
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
98%
#629
GeForce 8800 GS
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
97%
#631
GeForce 9800 GTX+
MSRP: $229|Avg: $50
94%
#632
Mobility Radeon X1700
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
94%
#633
Mobility Radeon HD 560v
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
93%
#634
GeForce 9300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $20
93%
#635
Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU
MSRP: $899|Avg: $400
93%
#636
GeForce 8400M G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
93%
#637
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
92%
#638
GeForce 8400M GS
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
92%
#639
GeForce 9100
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
90%
#640
GeForce 8300
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
90%
#641
GeForce 9600M GT
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce9400M is significantly newer (2015 vs 2009). The GeForce9400M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce9400M.

InsightGeForce9400MMobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-4.7%)
Leading raw performance (+4.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce9400M and Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi

NVIDIA

GeForce9400M

The GeForce9400M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 106 points.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi

The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 111 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce9400M scores 106 and the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi reaches 111 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce9400M is built on Maxwell while the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce9400M) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce9400M) vs 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi).

FeatureGeForce9400MMobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
G3D Mark Score
106
111+5%
Architecture
Maxwell
TeraScale
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
384
800+108%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.9032 TFLOPS+3%
0.88 TFLOPS
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
24
40+67%
L1 Cache
192 KB+20%
160 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce9400MMobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce9400M) vs 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi) — the GeForce9400M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce9400MMobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce9400M) vs 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce9400MMobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)+10%
10.1
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No NVENC (Tesla) (GeForce9400M) vs UVD (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs UVD.

FeatureGeForce9400MMobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
Encoder
No NVENC (Tesla)
UVD
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP3
UVD
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce9400M draws 33W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi's 30W — a 9.5% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce9400M) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce9400MMobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
TDP
33W
30W-9%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
80°C-6%
Perf/Watt
3.2
3.7+16%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce9400M is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2009).

FeatureGeForce9400MMobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
MSRP
$49
Avg Price (30d)
$10
Codename
GM108
M98
Release
March 13 2015
January 9 2009
Ranking
#847
#927