
GeForce Go 7800

GeForce9400M
GeForce Go 7800 vs GeForce9400M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce Go 7800 vs GeForce9400M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce Go 7800 vs GeForce9400M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce Go 7800
2013Why buy it
- ✅53.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌657.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 33W.
GeForce9400M
2015Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 250W, a 217W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce Go 7800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce Go 7800 vs GeForce9400M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce Go 7800
The GeForce Go 7800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 115 points. Launch price was $649.

GeForce9400M
The GeForce9400M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 106 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce Go 7800 scores 115 versus the GeForce9400M's 106 — the GeForce Go 7800 leads by 8.5%. The GeForce Go 7800 is built on Kepler while the GeForce9400M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce Go 7800) vs 384 (GeForce9400M). Raw compute: 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7800) vs 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce9400M). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1176 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7800 | GeForce9400M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 115+8% | 106 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+500% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.156 TFLOPS+360% | 0.9032 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1176 MHz+31% |
| ROPs | 48+500% | 8 |
| TMUs | 192+700% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce Go 7800 | GeForce9400M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce Go 7800 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce9400M carries 512 MB. GeForce9400M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce Go 7800 and 64-bit on the GeForce9400M. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce Go 7800) vs 1 MB (GeForce9400M) — the GeForce Go 7800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7800 | GeForce9400M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce Go 7800) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce9400M). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7800 | GeForce9400M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 11.1 (10_0)+23% |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3+57% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce Go 7800) vs No NVENC (Tesla) (GeForce9400M). Decoder: PureVideo vs PureVideo HD VP3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce Go 7800) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce9400M).
| Feature | GeForce Go 7800 | GeForce9400M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No NVENC (Tesla) |
| Decoder | PureVideo | PureVideo HD VP3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce Go 7800 draws 250W versus the GeForce9400M's 33W — a 153.4% difference. The GeForce9400M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 7800) vs 350W (GeForce9400M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7800 | GeForce9400M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 33W-87% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5 | 3.2+540% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













