
GeForce Go 7800
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7290M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce Go 7800
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 250W vs 100W.
Radeon HD 7290M
2012Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 250W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce Go 7800
2013Radeon HD 7290M
2012Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 250W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 250W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon HD 7290M better than GeForce Go 7800?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce Go 7800 make more sense than Radeon HD 7290M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce Go 7800 | Radeon HD 7290M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce Go 7800 | Radeon HD 7290M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce Go 7800 | Radeon HD 7290M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce Go 7800 | Radeon HD 7290M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce Go 7800 and Radeon HD 7290M

GeForce Go 7800
GeForce Go 7800
The GeForce Go 7800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 115 points. Launch price was $649.

Radeon HD 7290M
Radeon HD 7290M
The Radeon HD 7290M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 123 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce Go 7800 scores 115 versus the Radeon HD 7290M's 123 — the Radeon HD 7290M leads by 7%. The GeForce Go 7800 is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 7290M uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce Go 7800) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 7290M). Raw compute: 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7800) vs 2.176 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7290M).
| Feature | GeForce Go 7800 | Radeon HD 7290M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 115 | 123+7% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+80% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.156 TFLOPS+91% | 2.176 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 192+140% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 320 KB+67% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+200% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce Go 7800 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon HD 7290M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7800 | Radeon HD 7290M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce Go 7800 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7290M has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 7290M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce Go 7800) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 7290M) — the GeForce Go 7800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7800 | Radeon HD 7290M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+200% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce Go 7800) vs 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 7290M). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7800 | Radeon HD 7290M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 11.2 (11_0)+24% |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.4+110% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce Go 7800) vs UVD 3 (Radeon HD 7290M). Decoder: PureVideo vs UVD 3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce Go 7800) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX,Xvid (Radeon HD 7290M).
| Feature | GeForce Go 7800 | Radeon HD 7290M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | UVD 3 |
| Decoder | PureVideo | UVD 3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX,Xvid |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce Go 7800 draws 250W versus the Radeon HD 7290M's 100W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon HD 7290M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 7800) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7290M). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7800 | Radeon HD 7290M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 100W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5 | 1.2+140% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












