GeForce9400M vs RADEON X800 GTO

NVIDIA

GeForce9400M

2015Core: 1072 MHzBoost: 1176 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

RADEON X800 GTO

2020Core: 1825 MHzBoost: 2250 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce9400M vs RADEON X800 GTO Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce9400M vs RADEON X800 GTO FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce9400M vs RADEON X800 GTO: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce9400M

2015

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
  • Draws 33W instead of 300W, a 267W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than RADEON X800 GTO across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

RADEON X800 GTO

2020

Why buy it

  • 53.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • GeForce9400M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RADEON X800 GTO is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Older hardware, 256 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 809.1% higher power demand at 300W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RADEON X800 GTO is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 53.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 8.5% in PassMark G3D (115 vs 106), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RADEON X800 GTO is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 28nm, 72 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RADEON X800 GTO makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce9400M vs RADEON X800 GTO Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce9400M

The GeForce9400M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 106 points.

AMD

RADEON X800 GTO

The RADEON X800 GTO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 115 points. Launch price was $649.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce9400M scores 106 versus the RADEON X800 GTO's 115 — the RADEON X800 GTO leads by 8.5%. The GeForce9400M is built on Maxwell while the RADEON X800 GTO uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce9400M) vs 4,608 (RADEON X800 GTO). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce9400M) vs 20.74 TFLOPS (RADEON X800 GTO). Boost clocks: 1176 MHz vs 2250 MHz.

FeatureGeForce9400MRADEON X800 GTO
G3D Mark Score
106
115+8%
Architecture
Maxwell
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
384
4608+1100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.9032 TFLOPS
20.74 TFLOPS+2196%
Boost Clock
1176 MHz
2250 MHz+91%
ROPs
8
128+1500%
TMUs
24
288+1100%
L1 Cache
0.19 MB
1 MB+426%
L2 Cache
1 MB
4 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce9400M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON X800 GTO leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce9400MRADEON X800 GTO
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce9400M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON X800 GTO carries 256 MB. GeForce9400M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce9400M and 64-bit on the RADEON X800 GTO. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce9400M) vs 4 MB (RADEON X800 GTO) — the RADEON X800 GTO has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce9400MRADEON X800 GTO
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+100%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
4 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce9400M draws 33W versus the RADEON X800 GTO's 300W — a 160.4% difference. The GeForce9400M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce9400M) vs 350W (RADEON X800 GTO). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

FeatureGeForce9400MRADEON X800 GTO
TDP
33W-89%
300W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
3.2+700%
0.4
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RADEON X800 GTO (2020 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce9400MRADEON X800 GTO
MSRP
$199
Codename
GM108
Navi 21
Release
March 13 2015
October 28 2020
Ranking
#847
#42

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.