GRID K120Q vs GeForce 9700M GTS
GRID K120Q
Popular choices:
GeForce 9700M GTS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GRID K120Q is positioned at rank #276 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID K120Q
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 9700M GTS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID K120Q.
| Insight | GRID K120Q | GeForce 9700M GTS |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+6.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 9700M GTS remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID K120Q and GeForce 9700M GTS
GRID K120Q
The GRID K120Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 293 points. Launch price was $937.
GeForce 9700M GTS
The GeForce 9700M GTS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 312 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GRID K120Q scores 293 versus the GeForce 9700M GTS's 312 — the GeForce 9700M GTS leads by 6.5%. The GRID K120Q is built on Kepler while the GeForce 9700M GTS uses G9x, both on 28 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K120Q) vs 224 (GeForce 9700M GTS).
| Feature | GRID K120Q | GeForce 9700M GTS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 293 | 312+6% |
| Architecture | Kepler | G9x |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+586% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID K120Q | GeForce 9700M GTS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GRID K120Q | GeForce 9700M GTS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GRID K120Q) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9700M GTS). Vulkan: 1.2 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | GRID K120Q | GeForce 9700M GTS |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0)+8% | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+39% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1 (GRID K120Q) vs None (GeForce 9700M GTS). Decoder: NVDEC 1 vs VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GRID K120Q) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 9700M GTS).
| Feature | GRID K120Q | GeForce 9700M GTS |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1 | None |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1 | VP2 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID K120Q draws 225W versus the GeForce 9700M GTS's 150W — a 40% difference. The GeForce 9700M GTS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K120Q) vs 350W (GeForce 9700M GTS). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | GRID K120Q | GeForce 9700M GTS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 150W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 90 |
| Perf/Watt | 1.3 | 2.1+62% |
Value Analysis
The GRID K120Q launched at $125 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GeForce 9700M GTS launched at $0 and now averages $0. The GeForce 9700M GTS costs 100+% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.7 (GRID K120Q) vs Infinity (GeForce 9700M GTS) — the GeForce 9700M GTS offers Infinity% better value. The GRID K120Q is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | GRID K120Q | GeForce 9700M GTS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $125 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.7 | Infinity |
| Codename | GK104 | NB9E-GTX |
| Release | June 28 2013 | July 15 2008 |
| Ranking | #589 | #825 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID K120Q and GeForce 9700M GTS
