
GRID K120Q

Intel UHD Graphics 600
GRID K120Q vs Intel UHD Graphics 600 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID K120Q vs Intel UHD Graphics 600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GRID K120Q vs Intel UHD Graphics 600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID K120Q
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($125 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
- ✅Intel UHD Graphics 600 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GRID K120Q is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌1400% higher power demand at 225W vs 15W.
Intel UHD Graphics 600
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 225W, a 210W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 8.0 (2014−2015) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $125 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID K120Q vs Intel UHD Graphics 600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID K120Q
The GRID K120Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 293 points. Launch price was $937.

Intel UHD Graphics 600
The Intel UHD Graphics 600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 312 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GRID K120Q scores 293 versus the Intel UHD Graphics 600's 312 — the Intel UHD Graphics 600 leads by 6.5%. The GRID K120Q is built on Kepler while the Intel UHD Graphics 600 uses Generation 8.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K120Q) vs 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 600). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K120Q) vs 0.4032 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 600).
| Feature | GRID K120Q | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 293 | 312+6% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Generation 8.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+700% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.289 TFLOPS+468% | 0.4032 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+967% | 3 |
| TMUs | 128+433% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID K120Q | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID K120Q has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 600 carries 0 MB. GRID K120Q gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K120Q and System on the Intel UHD Graphics 600.
| Feature | GRID K120Q | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GRID K120Q) vs 12 (Intel UHD Graphics 600). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | GRID K120Q | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1 (GRID K120Q) vs QSV (Intel UHD Graphics 600). Decoder: NVDEC 1 vs QSV. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GRID K120Q) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (Intel UHD Graphics 600).
| Feature | GRID K120Q | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1 | QSV |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1 | QSV |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID K120Q draws 225W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 600's 15W — a 175% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K120Q) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | GRID K120Q | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 15W-93% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 55°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.3 | 20.8+1500% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID K120Q came in at $125, while the Intel UHD Graphics 600 launched at $0. On MSRP, Intel UHD Graphics 600 was 100+% cheaper ($125 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.3 (GRID K120Q) vs Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 600) — the Intel UHD Graphics 600 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Intel UHD Graphics 600 (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | GRID K120Q | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $125 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.3 | Infinity |
| Codename | GK104 | Broadwell GT2 |
| Release | June 28 2013 | September 5 2014 |
| Ranking | #589 | #703 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















