
GRID M3-3020 vs GeForce GT 1030

GRID M3-3020
Popular choices:

GeForce GT 1030
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GRID M3-3020 is positioned at rank #265 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID M3-3020
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID M3-3020 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 1030.
| Insight | GRID M3-3020 | GeForce GT 1030 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GRID M3-3020 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GRID M3-3020 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $95), it costs 47% less, resulting in a 97.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID M3-3020 | GeForce GT 1030 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+97.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($95) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M3-3020 and GeForce GT 1030

GRID M3-3020
The GRID M3-3020 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,500 points.

GeForce GT 1030
The GeForce GT 1030 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,407 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M3-3020 scores 2,500 and the GeForce GT 1030 reaches 2,407 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M3-3020 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GT 1030 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 640 (GRID M3-3020) vs 384 (GeForce GT 1030). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M3-3020) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 1030). Boost clocks: 1306 MHz vs 1468 MHz.
| Feature | GRID M3-3020 | GeForce GT 1030 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,500+4% | 2,407 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+67% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.672 TFLOPS+48% | 1.127 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | 1468 MHz+12% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40+67% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+122% | 144 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M3-3020 | GeForce GT 1030 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M3-3020) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GT 1030) — the GRID M3-3020 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID M3-3020 | GeForce GT 1030 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M3-3020 draws 250W versus the GeForce GT 1030's 30W — a 157.1% difference. The GeForce GT 1030 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M3-3020) vs 300W (GeForce GT 1030). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | GRID M3-3020 | GeForce GT 1030 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 30W-88% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | — | 145mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 10.0 | 80.2+702% |
Value Analysis
The GRID M3-3020 launched at $1000 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce GT 1030 launched at $79 and now averages $95. The GRID M3-3020 costs 47.4% less ($45 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 50.0 (GRID M3-3020) vs 25.3 (GeForce GT 1030) — the GRID M3-3020 offers 97.6% better value. The GeForce GT 1030 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | GRID M3-3020 | GeForce GT 1030 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000 | $79-92% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-47% | $95 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.0+98% | 25.3 |
| Codename | GM107 | GP108 |
| Release | May 18 2016 | May 17 2017 |
| Ranking | #587 | #641 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











