
GRID M3-3020 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti

GRID M3-3020
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GRID M3-3020 is positioned at rank #265 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID M3-3020
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M3-3020.
| Insight | GRID M3-3020 | GeForce GTX 650 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 650 Ti holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $50), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 68.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID M3-3020 | GeForce GTX 650 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+68.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M3-3020 and GeForce GTX 650 Ti

GRID M3-3020
The GRID M3-3020 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,500 points.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 9 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 928 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,525 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M3-3020 scores 2,500 and the GeForce GTX 650 Ti reaches 2,525 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M3-3020 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GTX 650 Ti uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GRID M3-3020) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M3-3020) vs 1.425 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 650 Ti).
| Feature | GRID M3-3020 | GeForce GTX 650 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,500 | 2,525+1% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 768+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.672 TFLOPS+17% | 1.425 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 64+60% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+400% | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M3-3020 | GeForce GTX 650 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M3-3020) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) — the GRID M3-3020 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID M3-3020 | GeForce GTX 650 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M3-3020 draws 250W versus the GeForce GTX 650 Ti's 110W — a 77.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M3-3020) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 650 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GRID M3-3020 | GeForce GTX 650 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 110W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 145mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70 |
| Perf/Watt | 10.0 | 23.0+130% |
Value Analysis
The GRID M3-3020 launched at $1000 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce GTX 650 Ti launched at $149 and now averages $30. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti costs 40% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 50.0 (GRID M3-3020) vs 84.2 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 650 Ti offers 68.4% better value. The GRID M3-3020 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2012).
| Feature | GRID M3-3020 | GeForce GTX 650 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000 | $149-85% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $30-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.0 | 84.2+68% |
| Codename | GM107 | GK106 |
| Release | May 18 2016 | October 9 2012 |
| Ranking | #587 | #633 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















