
GRID M60-8Q vs GeForce GTX 570

GRID M60-8Q
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 570 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score and 25% more VRAM (3 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M60-8Q.
| Insight | GRID M60-8Q | GeForce GTX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+25%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 570 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 570 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $500), it costs 95% less, resulting in a 1923.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID M60-8Q | GeForce GTX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1923.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M60-8Q and GeForce GTX 570

GRID M60-8Q
The GRID M60-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,884 points.

GeForce GTX 570
The GeForce GTX 570 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,930 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M60-8Q scores 3,884 and the GeForce GTX 570 reaches 3,930 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M60-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 570 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M60-8Q) vs 480 (GeForce GTX 570). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-8Q) vs 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 570).
| Feature | GRID M60-8Q | GeForce GTX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,884 | 3,930+1% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+327% | 480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+243% | 1.405 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+60% | 40 |
| TMUs | 128+113% | 60 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB | 960 KB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+217% | 0.63 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M60-8Q | GeForce GTX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID M60-8Q comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 570 has 3 GB. The GeForce GTX 570 offers 25% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 320-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M60-8Q) vs 0.63 MB (GeForce GTX 570) — the GRID M60-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID M60-8Q | GeForce GTX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2.5 GB+25% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 320-bit+400% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+217% | 0.63 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M60-8Q draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 570's 219W — a 2.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M60-8Q) vs 550W (GeForce GTX 570). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | GRID M60-8Q | GeForce GTX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 219W-3% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 17.3 | 17.9+3% |
Value Analysis
The GRID M60-8Q launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the GeForce GTX 570 launched at $349 and now averages $25. The GeForce GTX 570 costs 95% less ($475 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.8 (GRID M60-8Q) vs 157.2 (GeForce GTX 570) — the GeForce GTX 570 offers 1915.4% better value. The GRID M60-8Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | GRID M60-8Q | GeForce GTX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $349 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $25-95% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.8 | 157.2+1915% |
| Codename | GM204 | GF110 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | December 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #505 | #497 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















