GRID M60-8Q vs GeForce GTX 780M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 780M

#52

Radeon 8060S

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

88%

#202

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

424%

#204

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

384%

#205

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

383%

#209

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

348%

#210

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

346%

#212

GeForce GTX 780M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60

100%

#216

Radeon 8040S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

95%

#217

Radeon R7 +8G

MSRP: $49|Avg: $20

95%

#221

Radeon HD 6550A

MSRP: $30|Avg: $30

92%

#222

Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)

MSRP: $150|Avg: $75

91%

#224

GeForce GT 640M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

88%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GRID M60-8Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 780M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GRID M60-8Q	GeForce GTX 780M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 780M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 780M holds the technical lead. Priced at $60 (vs $500), it costs 88% less, resulting in a 725% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GRID M60-8Q	GeForce GTX 780M
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+725%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500)	✅More affordable ($60)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GRID M60-8Q Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 780M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GRID M60-8Q and GeForce GTX 780M

GRID M60-8Q

The GRID M60-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,884 points.

GeForce GTX 780M

The GeForce GTX 780M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 823 MHz to 797 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,845 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID M60-8Q scores 3,884 and the GeForce GTX 780M reaches 3,845 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M60-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 780M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M60-8Q) vs 1,536 (GeForce GTX 780M). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-8Q) vs 2.448 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780M). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 797 MHz.

Feature	GRID M60-8Q	GeForce GTX 780M
G3D Mark Score	3,884+1%	3,845
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2048+33%	1536
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.825 TFLOPS+97%	2.448 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1178 MHz+48%	797 MHz
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	128	128
L1 Cache	768 KB+500%	128 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID M60-8Q	GeForce GTX 780M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID M60-8Q comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 780M has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 780M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M60-8Q) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780M) — the GRID M60-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID M60-8Q	GeForce GTX 780M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	256-bit+300%
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M60-8Q draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 780M's 122W — a 59.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M60-8Q) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 780M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GRID M60-8Q	GeForce GTX 780M
TDP	225W	122W-46%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	80°C
Perf/Watt	17.3	31.5+82%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 780M costs 88% less ($440 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.8 (GRID M60-8Q) vs 64.1 (GeForce GTX 780M) — the GeForce GTX 780M offers 721.8% better value. The GRID M60-8Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).