GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs GeForce GTX 780M
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 780M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 780M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is significantly newer (2023 vs 2013). The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 780M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 721.3% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (12 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 780M.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce GTX 780M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+721.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-721.3%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (285mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 780M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $590 for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, it costs 90% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 19.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce GTX 780M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+19.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($590) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and GeForce GTX 780M
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
GeForce GTX 780M
The GeForce GTX 780M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 823 MHz to 797 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,845 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the GeForce GTX 780M's 3,845 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 721.3%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce GTX 780M uses Kepler, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 1,536 (GeForce GTX 780M). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 2.448 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780M). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 797 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce GTX 780M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+721% | 3,845 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Kepler |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680+400% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS+1538% | 2.448 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+227% | 797 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+150% | 32 |
| TMUs | 240+88% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB+5669% | 0.13 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+9500% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 780M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce GTX 780M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce GTX 780M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 780M has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 160 GB/s (GeForce GTX 780M) — a 215% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780M) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce GTX 780M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+200% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s+215% | 160 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+9500% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 780M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce GTX 780M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GTX 780M). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 780M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce GTX 780M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the GeForce GTX 780M's 122W — a 80.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 780M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce GTX 780M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 122W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 350W-50% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 285mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8+252% | 31.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 780M costs 89.8% less ($530 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 64.1 (GeForce GTX 780M) — the GeForce GTX 780M offers 19.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce GTX 780M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $590 | $60-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.5 | 64.1+20% |
| Codename | AD104 | GK104 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | May 11 2013 |
| Ranking | #11 | #511 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and GeForce GTX 780M
