Radeon RX 7600 vs GeForce GTX 780M
Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 780M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 780M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 7600 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2013). The Radeon RX 7600 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 780M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 331.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 780M.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7600 | GeForce GTX 780M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+331.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-331.2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 7600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $250 (vs $60), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 3.5% better value per dollar than the GeForce GTX 780M.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7600 | GeForce GTX 780M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+3.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7600 and GeForce GTX 780M
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
GeForce GTX 780M
The GeForce GTX 780M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 823 MHz to 797 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,845 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 7600 scores 16,581 versus the GeForce GTX 780M's 3,845 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 331.2%. The Radeon RX 7600 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the GeForce GTX 780M uses Kepler, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 1,536 (GeForce GTX 780M). Raw compute: 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600) vs 2.448 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780M). Boost clocks: 2655 MHz vs 797 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | GeForce GTX 780M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,581+331% | 3,845 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+33% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 21.75 TFLOPS+788% | 2.448 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2655 MHz+233% | 797 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+300% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 780M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | GeForce GTX 780M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 7600 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 780M has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 7600 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 7600) vs 160 GB/s (GeForce GTX 780M) — a 80% advantage for the Radeon RX 7600. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780M) — the Radeon RX 7600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | GeForce GTX 780M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+80% | 160 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 780M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | GeForce GTX 780M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GTX 780M). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 780M).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | GeForce GTX 780M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7600 draws 165W versus the GeForce GTX 780M's 122W — a 30% difference. The GeForce GTX 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon RX 7600) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 780M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | GeForce GTX 780M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 165W | 122W-26% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.5+219% | 31.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 780M costs 76% less ($190 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 66.3 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 64.1 (GeForce GTX 780M) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 3.4% better value. The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | GeForce GTX 780M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $269 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250 | $60-76% |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.3+3% | 64.1 |
| Codename | Navi 33 | GK104 |
| Release | May 24 2023 | May 11 2013 |
| Ranking | #118 | #511 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 7600 and GeForce GTX 780M
