
GRID P40-12Q vs Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire

GRID P40-12Q
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID P40-12Q is positioned at rank 351 and the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is on rank 264, so the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-12Q
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID P40-12Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
| Insight | GRID P40-12Q | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN (2012−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire holds the technical lead. Priced at $75 (vs $5,699), it costs 99% less, resulting in a 7443.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID P40-12Q | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+7443.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($5,699) | ✅More affordable ($75) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P40-12Q and Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire

GRID P40-12Q
The GRID P40-12Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,540 points.

Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 1 2012. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P40-12Q scores 5,540 and the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire reaches 5,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-12Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire uses GCN, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P40-12Q) vs 2,560 (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 900 MHz.
| Feature | GRID P40-12Q | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,540 | 5,500 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2560+25% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz+31% | 900 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P40-12Q | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit x2.
| Feature | GRID P40-12Q | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit x2+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P40-12Q draws 225W versus the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire's 200W — a 11.8% difference. The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-12Q) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GRID P40-12Q | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 200W-11% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Perf/Watt | 24.6 | 27.5+12% |
Value Analysis
The GRID P40-12Q launched at $5699 MSRP and currently averages $5699, while the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire launched at $300 and now averages $75. The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire costs 98.7% less ($5624 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.0 (GRID P40-12Q) vs 73.3 (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire) — the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire offers 7230% better value. The GRID P40-12Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | GRID P40-12Q | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5699 | $300-95% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5699 | $75-99% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.0 | 73.3+7230% |
| Codename | GM204 | Neptune CF |
| Release | August 30 2015 | May 1 2012 |
| Ranking | #433 | #350 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















