FirePro D300 vs GRID P40-12Q

FirePro D300

2014Core: 850 MHz

Popular choices:

VS

GRID P40-12Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

FirePro D300

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $5,199 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1077.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.4 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
  • Draws 150W instead of 225W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

GRID P40-12Q

2015

Why buy it

  • More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 1039.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $5,699 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.0 vs 11.4 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
  • 50% higher power demand at 225W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

So, is FirePro D300 better than GRID P40-12Q?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 5,722 vs 5,540 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer FirePro D300 is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack, plus much lower power draw (150W vs 225W).
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro D300 is the safer long-term GPU choice because it gives you the stronger overall hardware and feature outlook for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
FirePro D300 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $500 MSRP. FirePro D300 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. FirePro D300 is about $5,199 cheaper on MSRP at $500 MSRP versus $5,699 MSRP, and you are getting 3.3% higher G3D Mark. GRID P40-12Q is the newer 2015 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does GRID P40-12Q make more sense than FirePro D300?
Yes. GRID P40-12Q is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture and staying closer to $5,699 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of FirePro D300. The trade-off is that FirePro D300 currently gives you 3.3% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 1077.2%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetFirePro D300GRID P40-12Q
1080p
low103 FPS104 FPS
medium88 FPS90 FPS
high71 FPS73 FPS
ultra42 FPS44 FPS
1440p
low90 FPS91 FPS
medium77 FPS80 FPS
high56 FPS58 FPS
ultra32 FPS33 FPS
4K
low28 FPS29 FPS
medium27 FPS27 FPS
high18 FPS18 FPS
ultra15 FPS16 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetFirePro D300GRID P40-12Q
1080p
low158 FPS162 FPS
medium118 FPS128 FPS
high85 FPS94 FPS
ultra57 FPS75 FPS
1440p
low106 FPS119 FPS
medium74 FPS92 FPS
high56 FPS74 FPS
ultra40 FPS57 FPS
4K
low52 FPS68 FPS
medium37 FPS52 FPS
high30 FPS43 FPS
ultra20 FPS32 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetFirePro D300GRID P40-12Q
1080p
low257 FPS249 FPS
medium206 FPS199 FPS
high172 FPS166 FPS
ultra129 FPS125 FPS
1440p
low193 FPS187 FPS
medium154 FPS150 FPS
high129 FPS125 FPS
ultra97 FPS93 FPS
4K
low129 FPS125 FPS
medium103 FPS100 FPS
high86 FPS83 FPS
ultra64 FPS62 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetFirePro D300GRID P40-12Q
1080p
low180 FPS182 FPS
medium146 FPS148 FPS
high128 FPS133 FPS
ultra99 FPS103 FPS
1440p
low126 FPS132 FPS
medium104 FPS110 FPS
high92 FPS99 FPS
ultra67 FPS77 FPS
4K
low73 FPS77 FPS
medium56 FPS60 FPS
high45 FPS49 FPS
ultra31 FPS36 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro D300 and GRID P40-12Q

AMD

FirePro D300

The FirePro D300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,722 points.

NVIDIA

GRID P40-12Q

The GRID P40-12Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,540 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro D300 scores 5,722 and the GRID P40-12Q reaches 5,540 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro D300 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GRID P40-12Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro D300) vs 2,048 (GRID P40-12Q). Raw compute: 2.176 TFLOPS (FirePro D300) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-12Q).

FeatureFirePro D300GRID P40-12Q
G3D Mark Score
5,722+3%
5,540
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1280
2048+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.176 TFLOPS
4.825 TFLOPS+122%
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
80
128+60%
L1 Cache
320 KB
768 KB+140%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro D300GRID P40-12Q
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro D300) vs 2 MB (GRID P40-12Q) — the GRID P40-12Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro D300GRID P40-12Q
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro D300 draws 150W versus the GRID P40-12Q's 225W — a 40% difference. The FirePro D300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro D300) vs 350W (GRID P40-12Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureFirePro D300GRID P40-12Q
TDP
150W-33%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
242mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
38.1+55%
24.6
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro D300 launched at $500 MSRP, while the GRID P40-12Q launched at $5699. The FirePro D300 costs 91.2% less ($5199 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.4 (FirePro D300) vs 1.0 (GRID P40-12Q) — the FirePro D300 offers 1040% better value. The GRID P40-12Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).

FeatureFirePro D300GRID P40-12Q
MSRP
$500-91%
$5699
Performance per Dollar
11.4+1040%
1.0
Codename
Pitcairn
GM204
Release
January 18 2014
August 30 2015
Ranking
#506
#433