
FirePro D300
Popular choices:

GRID P40-12Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
FirePro D300
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,199 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1077.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.4 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 225W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GRID P40-12Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌1039.8% HIGHER MSRP$5,699 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.0 vs 11.4 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 225W vs 150W.
FirePro D300
2014GRID P40-12Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,199 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1077.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.4 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 225W, a 75W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌1039.8% HIGHER MSRP$5,699 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.0 vs 11.4 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 225W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
So, is FirePro D300 better than GRID P40-12Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GRID P40-12Q make more sense than FirePro D300?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FirePro D300 | GRID P40-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FirePro D300 | GRID P40-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 52 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 37 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 32 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FirePro D300 | GRID P40-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 249 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 199 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 62 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FirePro D300 | GRID P40-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro D300 and GRID P40-12Q

FirePro D300
FirePro D300
The FirePro D300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,722 points.

GRID P40-12Q
GRID P40-12Q
The GRID P40-12Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,540 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro D300 scores 5,722 and the GRID P40-12Q reaches 5,540 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro D300 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GRID P40-12Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro D300) vs 2,048 (GRID P40-12Q). Raw compute: 2.176 TFLOPS (FirePro D300) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-12Q).
| Feature | FirePro D300 | GRID P40-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,722+3% | 5,540 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 2048+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.176 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+122% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 768 KB+140% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro D300 | GRID P40-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro D300) vs 2 MB (GRID P40-12Q) — the GRID P40-12Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro D300 | GRID P40-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro D300 draws 150W versus the GRID P40-12Q's 225W — a 40% difference. The FirePro D300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro D300) vs 350W (GRID P40-12Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro D300 | GRID P40-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-33% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 38.1+55% | 24.6 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro D300 launched at $500 MSRP, while the GRID P40-12Q launched at $5699. The FirePro D300 costs 91.2% less ($5199 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.4 (FirePro D300) vs 1.0 (GRID P40-12Q) — the FirePro D300 offers 1040% better value. The GRID P40-12Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro D300 | GRID P40-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500-91% | $5699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.4+1040% | 1.0 |
| Codename | Pitcairn | GM204 |
| Release | January 18 2014 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #506 | #433 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













