FirePro D300 vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

FirePro D300

2014Core: 850 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

2023Boost: 1250 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro D300 vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro D300 vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro D300

2014

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 400% higher power demand at 150W vs 30W.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

2023

Why buy it

  • FirePro D300 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 30W instead of 150W, a 120W reduction.
  • More future proof: Unknown architecture on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 4.9% in PassMark G3D (6,000 vs 5,722), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro D300 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, FirePro D300 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p headroom, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro D300 vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro D300

The FirePro D300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,722 points.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in October 26 2023. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro D300 scores 5,722 and the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS reaches 6,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro D300) vs 1,536 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS).

FeatureFirePro D300Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
G3D Mark Score
5,722
6,000+5%
Process Node
28 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
1280
1536+20%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro D300Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro D300 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS carries 0 MB. FirePro D300 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the FirePro D300 and 128-bit on the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS.

FeatureFirePro D300Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR6
Shared
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro D300 draws 150W versus the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS's 30W — a 133.3% difference. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro D300) vs 1W (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

FeatureFirePro D300Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
TDP
150W
30W-80%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
242mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
38.1
200.0+425%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro D300 came in at $500, while the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS launched at $0. On MSRP, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS was 100+% cheaper ($500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.4 (FirePro D300) vs Infinity (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS) — the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (2023 vs 2014).

FeatureFirePro D300Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
MSRP
$500
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
11.4
Infinity
Codename
Pitcairn
Release
January 18 2014
October 26 2023
Ranking
#506
#459

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.