G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

FirePro D300

2014

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌400% higher power demand at 150W vs 30W.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

2023

Why buy it

✅Less risky long-term buy than FirePro D300: it remains the more sensible modern option while FirePro D300 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
✅Draws 30W instead of 150W, a 120W reduction.
✅More future proof: Unknown architecture on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

FirePro D300

2014

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

2023

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).

Why buy it

✅Less risky long-term buy than FirePro D300: it remains the more sensible modern option while FirePro D300 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
✅Draws 30W instead of 150W, a 120W reduction.
✅More future proof: Unknown architecture on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌400% higher power demand at 150W vs 30W.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS better than FirePro D300?

Yes. Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 6,000 vs 5,722 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is a 2023 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while FirePro D300 is a 2014 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2014 and a 4nm process instead of 28nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $500 MSRP, and you are getting 4.9% higher G3D Mark. FirePro D300 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is FirePro D300 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. FirePro D300 is 2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM, 5,722 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

FirePro D300 Benchmark Check

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	FirePro D300	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
1080p
low	103 FPS	97 FPS
medium	88 FPS	84 FPS
high	71 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	42 FPS	40 FPS
1440p
low	90 FPS	87 FPS
medium	77 FPS	75 FPS
high	56 FPS	53 FPS
ultra	32 FPS	31 FPS
4K
low	28 FPS	28 FPS
medium	27 FPS	27 FPS
high	18 FPS	17 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	15 FPS

Open FirePro D300 Open Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	FirePro D300	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
1080p
low	158 FPS	111 FPS
medium	118 FPS	77 FPS
high	85 FPS	52 FPS
ultra	57 FPS	36 FPS
1440p
low	106 FPS	76 FPS
medium	74 FPS	46 FPS
high	56 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	40 FPS	24 FPS
4K
low	52 FPS	35 FPS
medium	37 FPS	23 FPS
high	30 FPS	18 FPS
ultra	20 FPS	13 FPS

Open FirePro D300 Open Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	FirePro D300	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
1080p
low	257 FPS	270 FPS
medium	206 FPS	216 FPS
high	172 FPS	180 FPS
ultra	129 FPS	135 FPS
1440p
low	193 FPS	202 FPS
medium	154 FPS	162 FPS
high	129 FPS	135 FPS
ultra	97 FPS	101 FPS
4K
low	129 FPS	135 FPS
medium	103 FPS	108 FPS
high	86 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	64 FPS	68 FPS

Open FirePro D300 Open Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	FirePro D300	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
1080p
low	180 FPS	157 FPS
medium	146 FPS	129 FPS
high	128 FPS	114 FPS
ultra	99 FPS	91 FPS
1440p
low	126 FPS	115 FPS
medium	104 FPS	96 FPS
high	92 FPS	84 FPS
ultra	67 FPS	65 FPS
4K
low	73 FPS	66 FPS
medium	56 FPS	54 FPS
high	45 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	31 FPS	33 FPS

Open FirePro D300 Open Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro D300 and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

FirePro D300

The FirePro D300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,722 points.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in October 26 2023. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro D300 scores 5,722 and the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS reaches 6,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro D300) vs 1,536 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS).

Feature	FirePro D300	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
G3D Mark Score	5,722	6,000+5%
Process Node	28 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	1280	1536+20%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro D300	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro D300 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS has 0 MB. The FirePro D300 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	FirePro D300	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR6	Shared
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro D300 draws 150W versus the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS's 30W — a 133.3% difference. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro D300) vs 1W (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

Feature	FirePro D300	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
TDP	150W	30W-80%
Recommended PSU	350W	1W-100%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Integrated
Length	242mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	38.1	200.0+425%

💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro D300 launched at $500 MSRP, while the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS launched at $0. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS costs 100+% less ($500 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.4 (FirePro D300) vs Infinity (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS) — the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS offers Infinity% better value. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).