
FirePro D300

Radeon HD 7990
FirePro D300 vs Radeon HD 7990 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro D300 vs Radeon HD 7990 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro D300 vs Radeon HD 7990: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro D300
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $499 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 105.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.4 vs 5.6 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 375W, a 225W reduction.
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 305mm, a 63mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon HD 7990
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌99.8% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 11.4 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 375W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro D300 vs Radeon HD 7990 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro D300
The FirePro D300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,722 points.

Radeon HD 7990
The Radeon HD 7990 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 950 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,566 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro D300 scores 5,722 and the Radeon HD 7990 reaches 5,566 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro D300 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 7990 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro D300) vs 2,048 (Radeon HD 7990). Raw compute: 2.176 TFLOPS (FirePro D300) vs 4.096 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 7990).
| Feature | FirePro D300 | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,722+3% | 5,566 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 2048 ×2+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.176 TFLOPS | 4.096 TFLOPS ×2+88% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 ×2 |
| TMUs | 80 | 128 ×2+60% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 512 KB+60% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro D300 | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro D300 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7990 carries 3 GB. FirePro D300 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the FirePro D300 and 384-bit x2 on the Radeon HD 7990. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro D300) vs 768 KB (Radeon HD 7990) — the Radeon HD 7990 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro D300 | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit x2+200% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro D300) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon HD 7990). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 5.
| Feature | FirePro D300 | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+20% | 5 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro D300) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7990). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 3.2. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro D300) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon HD 7990).
| Feature | FirePro D300 | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | UVD 3.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro D300 draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 7990's 375W — a 85.7% difference. The FirePro D300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro D300) vs 750W (Radeon HD 7990). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 305mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85.
| Feature | FirePro D300 | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-60% | 375W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-53% | 750W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 305mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 38.1+157% | 14.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro D300 came in at $500, while the Radeon HD 7990 launched at $999. On MSRP, FirePro D300 was 49.9% cheaper ($499 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.4 (FirePro D300) vs 5.6 (Radeon HD 7990) — the FirePro D300 offers 103.6% better value. The newer card here is FirePro D300 (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | FirePro D300 | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500-50% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.4+104% | 5.6 |
| Codename | Pitcairn | Malta |
| Release | January 18 2014 | April 24 2013 |
| Ranking | #506 | #412 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















