FirePro D300
VS
Radeon HD 7990

FirePro D300 vs Radeon HD 7990

FirePro D300

2014Core: 850 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 7990

2013Core: 950 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro D300 is positioned at rank #130 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro D300

#66
Radeon PRO W7800
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
95%
#67
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1450
90%
#115
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
1291%
#130
FirePro D300
MSRP: $500|Avg: $20
100%
#131
Radeon Pro WX 3200
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
97%
#132
Radeon Pro WX 5100
MSRP: $499|Avg: $120
96%
#134
Quadro P2000 (móvel)
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
94%
#135
Quadro P3000 (móvel)
MSRP: $600|Avg: $200
93%
#136
Quadro P3000
MSRP: $600|Avg: $80
93%
#139
Quadro T1000 (móvel)
MSRP: $500|Avg: $120
87%
#140
Radeon Pro V520
MSRP: $800|Avg: $300
87%
#141
Quadro M5500
MSRP: $800|Avg: $200
86%
#142
Quadro K1200
MSRP: $300|Avg: $184
86%
#143
Quadro P400
MSRP: $169|Avg: $60
86%
#144
Radeon Pro WX 7100
MSRP: $799|Avg: $180
84%
#145
Quadro M520
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro D300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (4 GB vs 3 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 7990.

InsightFirePro D300Radeon HD 7990
Performance
Leading raw performance (+2.8%)
Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+33.3%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
Standard Size (305mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FirePro D300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro D300 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $999), it costs 98% less, resulting in a 5035% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightFirePro D300Radeon HD 7990
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+5035%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($20)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($999)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro D300 and Radeon HD 7990

AMD

FirePro D300

The FirePro D300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,722 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 7990

The Radeon HD 7990 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 950 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,566 points. Launch price was $999.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro D300 scores 5,722 and the Radeon HD 7990 reaches 5,566 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro D300 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 7990 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro D300) vs 2,048 (Radeon HD 7990). Raw compute: 2.176 TFLOPS (FirePro D300) vs 4.096 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 7990).

FeatureFirePro D300Radeon HD 7990
G3D Mark Score
5,722+3%
5,566
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1280
2048 ×2+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.176 TFLOPS
4.096 TFLOPS ×2+88%
ROPs
32
32 ×2
TMUs
80
128 ×2+60%
L1 Cache
320 KB
512 KB+60%
L2 Cache
512 KB
768 KB+50%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro D300Radeon HD 7990
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro D300 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7990 has 3 GB. The FirePro D300 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit x2. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro D300) vs 768 KB (Radeon HD 7990) — the Radeon HD 7990 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro D300Radeon HD 7990
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+33%
3 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit
384-bit x2+200%
L2 Cache
512 KB
768 KB+50%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro D300) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon HD 7990). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 5.

FeatureFirePro D300Radeon HD 7990
DirectX
12
12 (11_1)
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
6+20%
5
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro D300) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7990). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 3.2. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro D300) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon HD 7990).

FeatureFirePro D300Radeon HD 7990
Encoder
VCE 1.0
VCE 1.0
Decoder
UVD 4.0
UVD 3.2
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,VC-1
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro D300 draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 7990's 375W — a 85.7% difference. The FirePro D300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro D300) vs 750W (Radeon HD 7990). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 305mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85.

FeatureFirePro D300Radeon HD 7990
TDP
150W-60%
375W
Recommended PSU
350W-53%
750W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
2x 8-pin
Length
242mm
305mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
80°C-6%
85
Perf/Watt
38.1+157%
14.8
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro D300 launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Radeon HD 7990 launched at $999 and now averages $999. The FirePro D300 costs 98% less ($979 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 286.1 (FirePro D300) vs 5.6 (Radeon HD 7990) — the FirePro D300 offers 5008.9% better value. The FirePro D300 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).

FeatureFirePro D300Radeon HD 7990
MSRP
$500-50%
$999
Avg Price (30d)
$20-98%
$999
Performance per Dollar
286.1+5009%
5.6
Codename
Pitcairn
Malta
Release
January 18 2014
April 24 2013
Ranking
#506
#412