FirePro D300 vs Arc Pro A30M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro D300 vs Intel Arc Pro A30M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro D300 vs Intel Arc Pro A30M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro D300

2014

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.

Intel Arc Pro A30M

2022

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Intel Arc Pro A30M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.4% in PassMark G3D (5,862 vs 5,722), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Intel Arc Pro A30M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 8 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2014. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

FirePro D300 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, FirePro D300 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Intel Arc Pro A30M has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro D300 vs Intel Arc Pro A30M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro D300

The FirePro D300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,722 points.

Intel Arc Pro A30M

The Intel Arc Pro A30M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 8 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,862 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro D300 scores 5,722 and the Intel Arc Pro A30M reaches 5,862 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro D300 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Intel Arc Pro A30M uses Generation 12.7, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro D300) vs 1,024 (Intel Arc Pro A30M). Raw compute: 2.176 TFLOPS (FirePro D300) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A30M).

Feature	FirePro D300	Intel Arc Pro A30M
G3D Mark Score	5,722	5,862+2%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Generation 12.7
Process Node	28 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	1280+25%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.176 TFLOPS	4.096 TFLOPS+88%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80+25%	64
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	4 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro D300	Intel Arc Pro A30M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the FirePro D300 and System on the Intel Arc Pro A30M. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro D300) vs 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro A30M) — the Intel Arc Pro A30M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro D300	Intel Arc Pro A30M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	Shared
Bus Width	128-bit	System
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	4 MB+700%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro D300 draws 150W versus the Intel Arc Pro A30M's 50W — a 100% difference. The Intel Arc Pro A30M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro D300) vs 350W (Intel Arc Pro A30M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	FirePro D300	Intel Arc Pro A30M
TDP	150W	50W-67%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	242mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	38.1	117.2+208%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Intel Arc Pro A30M (2022 vs 2014).

Feature	FirePro D300	Intel Arc Pro A30M
MSRP	$500	—
Codename	Pitcairn	DG2-128
Release	January 18 2014	August 8 2022
Ranking	#506	#402

Search FirePro D300 on Amazon

Search Intel Arc Pro A30M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.