
FirePro D300
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 770
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro D300 is positioned at rank #130 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro D300
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 770 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro D300.
| Insight | FirePro D300 | GeForce GTX 770 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro D300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro D300 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $40), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 92% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro D300 | GeForce GTX 770 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+92%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro D300 and GeForce GTX 770

FirePro D300
The FirePro D300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,722 points.

GeForce GTX 770
The GeForce GTX 770 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,961 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro D300 scores 5,722 and the GeForce GTX 770 reaches 5,961 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro D300 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 770 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro D300) vs 1,536 (GeForce GTX 770). Raw compute: 2.176 TFLOPS (FirePro D300) vs 3.333 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 770).
| Feature | FirePro D300 | GeForce GTX 770 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,722 | 5,961+4% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 1536+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.176 TFLOPS | 3.333 TFLOPS+53% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+150% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro D300 | GeForce GTX 770 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | FirePro D300 | GeForce GTX 770 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro D300) vs 12.0 (GeForce GTX 770). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro D300 | GeForce GTX 770 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro D300) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 770). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs PureVideo VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro D300) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 770).
| Feature | FirePro D300 | GeForce GTX 770 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | NVENC 1st gen |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | PureVideo VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro D300 draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 770's 230W — a 42.1% difference. The FirePro D300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro D300) vs 600W (GeForce GTX 770). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | FirePro D300 | GeForce GTX 770 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-35% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-42% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 38.1+47% | 25.9 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro D300 launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GeForce GTX 770 launched at $399 and now averages $40. The FirePro D300 costs 50% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 286.1 (FirePro D300) vs 149.0 (GeForce GTX 770) — the FirePro D300 offers 92% better value. The FirePro D300 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | FirePro D300 | GeForce GTX 770 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $399-20% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-50% | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | 286.1+92% | 149.0 |
| Codename | Pitcairn | GK104 |
| Release | January 18 2014 | May 30 2013 |
| Ranking | #506 | #398 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















