FirePro D300 vs GRID P40-4Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro D300 vs GRID P40-4Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro D300 vs GRID P40-4Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro D300

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,500 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 479.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.4 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
✅Draws 150W instead of 225W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌24100% longer card at 242mm vs 1mm.

GRID P40-4Q

2013

Why buy it

✅Measures 1mm instead of 242mm, a 241mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
500% HIGHER MSRP
$3,000 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 11.4 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
❌50% higher power demand at 225W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID P40-4Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.6% in PassMark G3D (5,926 vs 5,722), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro D300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2014 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

FirePro D300 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,500 cheaper on MSRP at $500 vs $3,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 479.3% (11.4 vs 2.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GRID P40-4Q still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FirePro D300 vs GRID P40-4Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro D300

The FirePro D300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,722 points.

GRID P40-4Q

The GRID P40-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,926 points. Launch price was $469.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro D300 scores 5,722 and the GRID P40-4Q reaches 5,926 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro D300 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GRID P40-4Q uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro D300) vs 1,536 (GRID P40-4Q). Raw compute: 2.176 TFLOPS (FirePro D300) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-4Q).

Feature	FirePro D300	GRID P40-4Q
G3D Mark Score	5,722	5,926+4%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1280	1536+20%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.176 TFLOPS	2.289 TFLOPS+5%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80	128+60%
L1 Cache	320 KB+150%	128 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro D300	GRID P40-4Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the FirePro D300 and 128-bit on the GRID P40-4Q.

Feature	FirePro D300	GRID P40-4Q
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro D300) vs 12_1 (GRID P40-4Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 0.

Feature	FirePro D300	GRID P40-4Q
DirectX	12	12_1
Max Displays	6	0

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro D300 draws 150W versus the GRID P40-4Q's 225W — a 40% difference. The FirePro D300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro D300) vs 350W (GRID P40-4Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

Feature	FirePro D300	GRID P40-4Q
TDP	150W-33%	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	242mm	1mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	38.1+45%	26.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro D300 came in at $500, while the GRID P40-4Q launched at $3000. On MSRP, FirePro D300 was 83.3% cheaper ($2500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.4 (FirePro D300) vs 2.0 (GRID P40-4Q) — the FirePro D300 offers 470% better value. The newer card here is FirePro D300 (2014 vs 2013).

Feature	FirePro D300	GRID P40-4Q
MSRP	$500-83%	$3000
Performance per Dollar	11.4+470%	2.0
Codename	Pitcairn	GK104
Release	January 18 2014	June 28 2013
Ranking	#506	#628

Search FirePro D300 on Amazon

Search GRID P40-4Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.