FirePro D300 vs GeForce GTX 680

CPU

GPU

FirePro D300

2014Core: 850 MHz

GeForce GTX 680

2012Core: 1006 MHzBoost: 1058 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

FirePro D300

150

5,722

+2.0%

5,609

0.0%

GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro D300 is positioned at rank #130 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro D300

#66

Radeon PRO W7800

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200

95%

#67

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1450

90%

#115

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1291%

#130

FirePro D300

MSRP: $500|Avg: $20

100%

#131

Radeon Pro WX 3200

MSRP: $199|Avg: $199

97%

#132

Radeon Pro WX 5100

MSRP: $499|Avg: $120

96%

#134

Quadro P2000 (móvel)

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

94%

#135

Quadro P3000 (móvel)

MSRP: $600|Avg: $200

93%

#136

Quadro P3000

MSRP: $600|Avg: $80

93%

#139

Quadro T1000 (móvel)

MSRP: $500|Avg: $120

87%

#140

Radeon Pro V520

MSRP: $800|Avg: $300

87%

#141

Quadro M5500

MSRP: $800|Avg: $200

86%

#142

Quadro K1200

MSRP: $300|Avg: $184

86%

#143

Quadro P400

MSRP: $169|Avg: $60

86%

#144

Radeon Pro WX 7100

MSRP: $799|Avg: $180

84%

#145

Quadro M520

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

84%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro D300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 680.

Insight	FirePro D300	GeForce GTX 680
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+2%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	Standard Size (256mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FirePro D300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro D300 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $40), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 104% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	FirePro D300	GeForce GTX 680
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+104%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($20)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

FirePro D300 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 680 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro D300 and GeForce GTX 680

FirePro D300

The FirePro D300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,722 points.

GeForce GTX 680

The GeForce GTX 680 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1006 MHz to 1058 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 195W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,609 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro D300 scores 5,722 and the GeForce GTX 680 reaches 5,609 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro D300 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 680 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro D300) vs 1,536 (GeForce GTX 680). Raw compute: 2.176 TFLOPS (FirePro D300) vs 3.25 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 680).

Feature	FirePro D300	GeForce GTX 680
G3D Mark Score	5,722+2%	5,609
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1280	1536+20%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.176 TFLOPS	3.25 TFLOPS+49%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80	128+60%
L1 Cache	320 KB+150%	128 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro D300	GeForce GTX 680
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.

Feature	FirePro D300	GeForce GTX 680
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro D300) vs 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 680). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

Feature	FirePro D300	GeForce GTX 680
DirectX	12	12 (FL 11_0)
Vulkan	1.2+9%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	6+50%	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro D300) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 680). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs PureVideo VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro D300) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 680).

Feature	FirePro D300	GeForce GTX 680
Encoder	VCE 1.0	NVENC 1st gen
Decoder	UVD 4.0	PureVideo VP5
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro D300 draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 680's 195W — a 26.1% difference. The FirePro D300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro D300) vs 550W (GeForce GTX 680). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 256mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 98°C.

Feature	FirePro D300	GeForce GTX 680
TDP	150W-23%	195W
Recommended PSU	350W-36%	550W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 6-pin
Length	242mm	256mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C-18%	98°C
Perf/Watt	38.1+32%	28.8

💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro D300 launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GeForce GTX 680 launched at $499 and now averages $40. The FirePro D300 costs 50% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 286.1 (FirePro D300) vs 140.2 (GeForce GTX 680) — the FirePro D300 offers 104.1% better value. The FirePro D300 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2012).