
GeForce MX570
Popular choices:

GRID P40-12Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce MX570
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,549 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 3835.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.3 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 225W, a 200W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GRID P40-12Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌3699.3% HIGHER MSRP$5,699 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.0 vs 38.3 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌800% higher power demand at 225W vs 25W.
GeForce MX570
2022GRID P40-12Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,549 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 3835.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.3 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 225W, a 200W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌3699.3% HIGHER MSRP$5,699 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.0 vs 38.3 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌800% higher power demand at 225W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce MX570 better than GRID P40-12Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GRID P40-12Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce MX570 | GRID P40-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce MX570 | GRID P40-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 32 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce MX570 | GRID P40-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 249 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 199 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 194 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 62 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce MX570 | GRID P40-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX570 and GRID P40-12Q

GeForce MX570
GeForce MX570
The GeForce MX570 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,738 points.

GRID P40-12Q
GRID P40-12Q
The GRID P40-12Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,540 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX570 scores 5,738 and the GRID P40-12Q reaches 5,540 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX570 is built on Ampere while the GRID P40-12Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce MX570) vs 2,048 (GRID P40-12Q). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-12Q). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | GRID P40-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,738+4% | 5,540 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+2% |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 1178 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 40 | 64+60% |
| TMUs | 64 | 128+100% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce MX570 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GRID P40-12Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | GRID P40-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | GRID P40-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX570 draws 25W versus the GRID P40-12Q's 225W — a 160% difference. The GeForce MX570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX570) vs 350W (GRID P40-12Q). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | GRID P40-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-89% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 229.5+833% | 24.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX570 launched at $150 MSRP, while the GRID P40-12Q launched at $5699. The GeForce MX570 costs 97.4% less ($5549 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 38.3 (GeForce MX570) vs 1.0 (GRID P40-12Q) — the GeForce MX570 offers 3730% better value. The GeForce MX570 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | GRID P40-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-97% | $5699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.3+3730% | 1.0 |
| Codename | GA107 | GM204 |
| Release | Maio 2022 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #407 | #433 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













