GeForce MX570 vs Arc Pro A30M

GeForce MX570 vs Intel Arc Pro A30M Performance Spectrum

GeForce MX570

4 GB 25

5,738

0.0%

GeForce GTX 470

GeForce GTX 775M

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel)

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 2060

GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

Intel Arc Pro A30M

4 GB 50

5,862

+2.2%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce MX570 vs Intel Arc Pro A30M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce MX570 vs Intel Arc Pro A30M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce MX570

2022

Why buy it

✅5.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 25W instead of 50W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Intel Arc Pro A30M

2022

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce MX570 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 38.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 50W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce MX570 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 5.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Intel Arc Pro A30M instead at 5,862 vs 5,738, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce MX570 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 16 vs 8 ray-tracing units. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce MX570 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce MX570 vs Intel Arc Pro A30M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce MX570

The GeForce MX570 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,738 points.

Intel Arc Pro A30M

The Intel Arc Pro A30M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 8 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,862 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX570 scores 5,738 and the Intel Arc Pro A30M reaches 5,862 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX570 is built on Ampere while the Intel Arc Pro A30M uses Generation 12.7, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce MX570) vs 1,024 (Intel Arc Pro A30M). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A30M). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 2000 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (GeForce MX570) vs 8 (Intel Arc Pro A30M) with 64 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce MX570	Intel Arc Pro A30M
G3D Mark Score	5,738	5,862+2%
Architecture	Ampere	Generation 12.7
Process Node	8 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	2048+100%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.731 TFLOPS+16%	4.096 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1155 MHz	2000 MHz+73%
ROPs	40+25%	32
TMUs	64	64
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%
Ray Tracing Cores	16+100%	8

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce MX570 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Intel Arc Pro A30M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce MX570	Intel Arc Pro A30M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX570 and System on the Intel Arc Pro A30M. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce MX570) vs 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro A30M) — the Intel Arc Pro A30M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce MX570	Intel Arc Pro A30M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	96 GB/s	System
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX570 draws 25W versus the Intel Arc Pro A30M's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce MX570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX570) vs 350W (Intel Arc Pro A30M). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.