CPU
GPU
GeForce MX570
Popular choices:
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce MX570 is positioned at rank #117 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX570
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce MX570 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce MX570 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.6%) |
| Longevity | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) | Legacy (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX570 and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
GeForce MX570
The GeForce MX570 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,738 points.
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in October 26 2023. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX570 scores 5,738 and the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS reaches 6,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce MX570) vs 1,536 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1250 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,738 | 6,000+5% |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+33% | 1536 |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 1250 MHz+8% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce MX570 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS has 0 MB. The GeForce MX570 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 96 GB/s (GeForce MX570) vs 135 GB/s (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS) — a 40.6% advantage for the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 135 GB/s+41% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX570 draws 25W versus the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS's 30W — a 18.2% difference. The GeForce MX570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX570) vs 1W (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS). Power connectors: Mobile vs Integrated.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-17% | 30W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Integrated |
| Perf/Watt | 229.5+15% | 200.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX570 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $120, while the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS costs 100+% less ($120 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 47.8 (GeForce MX570) vs Infinity (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS) — the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS offers Infinity% better value. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $120 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8 | Infinity |
| Codename | GA107 | — |
| Release | Maio 2022 | October 26 2023 |
| Ranking | #407 | #459 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce MX570 and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
