
GeForce MX570

RTX A400
GeForce MX570 vs RTX A400 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce MX570 vs RTX A400 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce MX570 vs RTX A400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce MX570
2022Why buy it
- ✅78.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅166.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (64 vs 24).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 50W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌11.1% HIGHER MSRP$150 MSRPvs$135 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 38.3 vs 44.3 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $135 MSRP).
RTX A400
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $15 less on MSRP ($135 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 15.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.3 vs 38.3 G3D/$ ($135 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce MX570 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (24 vs 64), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 50W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce MX570 vs RTX A400 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce MX570
The GeForce MX570 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,738 points.

RTX A400
The RTX A400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1762 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,983 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX570 scores 5,738 and the RTX A400 reaches 5,983 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX570 is built on Ampere while the RTX A400 uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce MX570) vs 768 (RTX A400). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570) vs 2.706 TFLOPS (RTX A400). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1762 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (GeForce MX570) vs 6 (RTX A400) with 64 Tensor cores vs 24.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,738 | 5,983+4% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+167% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS+75% | 2.706 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 1762 MHz+53% |
| ROPs | 40+150% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+167% | 24 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16+167% | 6 |
| Tensor Cores | 64+167% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX570 and 128-bit on the RTX A400.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX570 draws 25W versus the RTX A400's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce MX570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX570) vs 350W (RTX A400). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-50% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 229.5+92% | 119.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce MX570 came in at $150, while the RTX A400 launched at $135. On MSRP, RTX A400 was 10% cheaper ($15 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 38.3 (GeForce MX570) vs 44.3 (RTX A400) — the RTX A400 offers 15.7% better value. The newer card here is RTX A400 (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $135-10% |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.3 | 44.3+16% |
| Codename | GA107 | GA107 |
| Release | Maio 2022 | April 16 2024 |
| Ranking | #407 | #397 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















