GeForce MX570 vs RTX A400
GeForce MX570
Popular choices:
RTX A400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce MX570 is positioned at rank 117 and the RTX A400 is on rank 26, so the RTX A400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX570
Performance Per Dollar RTX A400
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce MX570.
| Insight | GeForce MX570 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.3%) |
| Longevity | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce MX570 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $120 versus $135 for the RTX A400, it costs 11% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 7.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce MX570 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+7.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($120) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($135) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX570 and RTX A400
GeForce MX570
The GeForce MX570 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,738 points.
RTX A400
The RTX A400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1762 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,983 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX570 scores 5,738 and the RTX A400 reaches 5,983 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX570 is built on Ampere while the RTX A400 uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce MX570) vs 768 (RTX A400). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570) vs 2.706 TFLOPS (RTX A400). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1762 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (GeForce MX570) vs 6 (RTX A400) with 64 Tensor cores vs 24.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,738 | 5,983+4% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+167% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS+75% | 2.706 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 1762 MHz+53% |
| ROPs | 40+150% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+167% | 24 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16+167% | 6 |
| Tensor Cores | 64+167% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX570 draws 25W versus the RTX A400's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce MX570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX570) vs 350W (RTX A400). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-50% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 229.5+92% | 119.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX570 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $120, while the RTX A400 launched at $135 and now averages $135. The GeForce MX570 costs 11.1% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 47.8 (GeForce MX570) vs 44.3 (RTX A400) — the GeForce MX570 offers 7.9% better value. The RTX A400 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $135-10% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $120-11% | $135 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+8% | 44.3 |
| Codename | GA107 | GA107 |
| Release | Maio 2022 | April 16 2024 |
| Ranking | #407 | #397 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce MX570 and RTX A400
