GeForce MX570 vs RTX A400

NVIDIA

GeForce MX570

2022Core: 832 MHzBoost: 1155 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

RTX A400

2024Core: 727 MHzBoost: 1762 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce MX570 vs RTX A400 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce MX570 vs RTX A400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce MX570 vs RTX A400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce MX570

2022

Why buy it

  • 78.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 166.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (64 vs 24).
  • Draws 25W instead of 50W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 11.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $150 MSRPvs$135 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 38.3 vs 44.3 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $135 MSRP).

RTX A400

2024

Why buy it

  • Costs $15 less on MSRP ($135 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • Delivers 15.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.3 vs 38.3 G3D/$ ($135 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce MX570 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (24 vs 64), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
  • 100% higher power demand at 50W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce MX570 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 78.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward RTX A400 instead at 5,983 vs 5,738, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RTX A400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2024 generation instead of 2022. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RTX A400 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $15 cheaper on MSRP at $135 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 15.9% (44.3 vs 38.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GeForce MX570 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce MX570 vs RTX A400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce MX570

The GeForce MX570 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,738 points.

NVIDIA

RTX A400

The RTX A400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1762 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,983 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX570 scores 5,738 and the RTX A400 reaches 5,983 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX570 is built on Ampere while the RTX A400 uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce MX570) vs 768 (RTX A400). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570) vs 2.706 TFLOPS (RTX A400). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1762 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (GeForce MX570) vs 6 (RTX A400) with 64 Tensor cores vs 24.

FeatureGeForce MX570RTX A400
G3D Mark Score
5,738
5,983+4%
Architecture
Ampere
Ampere
Process Node
8 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
2048+167%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.731 TFLOPS+75%
2.706 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1155 MHz
1762 MHz+53%
ROPs
40+150%
16
TMUs
64+167%
24
Ray Tracing Cores
16+167%
6
Tensor Cores
64+167%
24

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce MX570RTX A400
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX570 and 128-bit on the RTX A400.

FeatureGeForce MX570RTX A400
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX570 draws 25W versus the RTX A400's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce MX570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX570) vs 350W (RTX A400). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce MX570RTX A400
TDP
25W-50%
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Mobile
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
229.5+92%
119.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce MX570 came in at $150, while the RTX A400 launched at $135. On MSRP, RTX A400 was 10% cheaper ($15 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 38.3 (GeForce MX570) vs 44.3 (RTX A400) — the RTX A400 offers 15.7% better value. The newer card here is RTX A400 (2024 vs 2022).

FeatureGeForce MX570RTX A400
MSRP
$150
$135-10%
Performance per Dollar
38.3
44.3+16%
Codename
GA107
GA107
Release
Maio 2022
April 16 2024
Ranking
#407
#397

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.