GeForce MX570 vs Radeon RX 5500M
GeForce MX570
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 5500M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce MX570 is positioned at rank 117 and the Radeon RX 5500M is on rank 46, so the Radeon RX 5500M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX570
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 5500M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 5500M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce MX570.
| Insight | GeForce MX570 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.8%) |
| Longevity | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 5500M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $100 versus $120 for the GeForce MX570, it costs 17% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 24.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce MX570 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+24.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120) | ✅More affordable ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX570 and Radeon RX 5500M
GeForce MX570
The GeForce MX570 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,738 points.
Radeon RX 5500M
The Radeon RX 5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1375 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,954 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX570 scores 5,738 and the Radeon RX 5500M reaches 5,954 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX570 is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 5500M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce MX570) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5500M). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5500M). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1645 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,738 | 5,954+4% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+45% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS+2% | 4.632 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 1645 MHz+42% |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 88+38% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 96 GB/s (GeForce MX570) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 5500M) — a 133.3% advantage for the Radeon RX 5500M. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 224 GB/s+133% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX570 draws 25W versus the Radeon RX 5500M's 85W — a 109.1% difference. The GeForce MX570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX570) vs 350W (Radeon RX 5500M). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-71% | 85W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 229.5+228% | 70.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 5500M costs 16.7% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 47.8 (GeForce MX570) vs 59.5 (Radeon RX 5500M) — the Radeon RX 5500M offers 24.5% better value. The GeForce MX570 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $120 | $100-17% |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8 | 59.5+24% |
| Codename | GA107 | Navi 14 |
| Release | Maio 2022 | October 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #407 | #400 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce MX570 and Radeon RX 5500M
