GeForce MX570 vs GRID P40-4Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce MX570 vs GRID P40-4Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce MX570 vs GRID P40-4Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce MX570

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,850 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1836.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.3 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 25W instead of 225W, a 200W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

GRID P40-4Q

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1900% HIGHER MSRP
$3,000 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 38.3 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌800% higher power demand at 225W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID P40-4Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.3% in PassMark G3D (5,926 vs 5,738), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce MX570 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 8nm process instead of 28nm, 16 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2013. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce MX570 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,850 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $3,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1836.6% (38.3 vs 2.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GRID P40-4Q still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce MX570 vs GRID P40-4Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce MX570

The GeForce MX570 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,738 points.

GRID P40-4Q

The GRID P40-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,926 points. Launch price was $469.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX570 scores 5,738 and the GRID P40-4Q reaches 5,926 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX570 is built on Ampere while the GRID P40-4Q uses Kepler, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce MX570) vs 1,536 (GRID P40-4Q). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-4Q).

Feature	GeForce MX570	GRID P40-4Q
G3D Mark Score	5,738	5,926+3%
Architecture	Ampere	Kepler
Process Node	8 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2048+33%	1536
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.731 TFLOPS+107%	2.289 TFLOPS
ROPs	40+25%	32
TMUs	64	128+100%
L1 Cache	2 MB+1438%	0.13 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce MX570 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID P40-4Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce MX570	GRID P40-4Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX570 and 128-bit on the GRID P40-4Q. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce MX570) vs 0.5 MB (GRID P40-4Q) — the GeForce MX570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce MX570	GRID P40-4Q
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX570 draws 25W versus the GRID P40-4Q's 225W — a 160% difference. The GeForce MX570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX570) vs 350W (GRID P40-4Q). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce MX570	GRID P40-4Q
TDP	25W-89%	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Mobile	PCIe-powered
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	229.5+773%	26.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce MX570 came in at $150, while the GRID P40-4Q launched at $3000. On MSRP, GeForce MX570 was 95% cheaper ($2850 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 38.3 (GeForce MX570) vs 2.0 (GRID P40-4Q) — the GeForce MX570 offers 1815% better value. The newer card here is GeForce MX570 (2022 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce MX570	GRID P40-4Q
MSRP	$150-95%	$3000
Performance per Dollar	38.3+1815%	2.0
Codename	GA107	GK104
Release	Maio 2022	June 28 2013
Ranking	#407	#628

Search GeForce MX570 on Amazon

Search GRID P40-4Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.