
GRID P40-24Q vs Quadro P2000

GRID P40-24Q
Popular choices:

Quadro P2000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID P40-24Q is positioned at rank 338 and the Quadro P2000 is on rank 89, so the Quadro P2000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-24Q
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P2000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID P40-24Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro P2000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GRID P40-24Q | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+25%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P2000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro P2000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $190 (vs $200), it costs 5% less, resulting in a 3.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID P40-24Q | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+3.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) | ✅More affordable ($190) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P40-24Q and Quadro P2000

GRID P40-24Q
The GRID P40-24Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,057 points.

Quadro P2000
The Quadro P2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1076 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,964 points. Launch price was $585.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P40-24Q scores 7,057 and the Quadro P2000 reaches 6,964 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-24Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro P2000 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P40-24Q) vs 1,024 (Quadro P2000). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-24Q) vs 3.031 TFLOPS (Quadro P2000). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1480 MHz.
| Feature | GRID P40-24Q | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,057+1% | 6,964 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+100% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+59% | 3.031 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1480 MHz+26% |
| ROPs | 64+60% | 40 |
| TMUs | 128+100% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+100% | 384 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+60% | 1.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P40-24Q | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID P40-24Q comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P2000 has 5 GB. The Quadro P2000 offers 25% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P40-24Q) vs 1.25 MB (Quadro P2000) — the GRID P40-24Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID P40-24Q | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 5 GB+25% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+60% | 1.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (GRID P40-24Q) vs 12.0 (Quadro P2000). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID P40-24Q | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (GRID P40-24Q) vs NVENC 6.0 (Quadro P2000). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP7 vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID P40-24Q) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2000).
| Feature | GRID P40-24Q | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | NVENC 6.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP7 | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P40-24Q draws 225W versus the Quadro P2000's 75W — a 100% difference. The Quadro P2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-24Q) vs 350W (Quadro P2000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 201mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GRID P40-24Q | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 75W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 201mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Perf/Watt | 31.4 | 92.9+196% |
Value Analysis
The GRID P40-24Q launched at $5699 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the Quadro P2000 launched at $425 and now averages $190. The Quadro P2000 costs 5% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 35.3 (GRID P40-24Q) vs 36.7 (Quadro P2000) — the Quadro P2000 offers 4% better value. The Quadro P2000 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID P40-24Q | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5699 | $425-93% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $190-5% |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.3 | 36.7+4% |
| Codename | GM204 | GP106 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | February 6 2017 |
| Ranking | #433 | #346 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















