
GRID P40-24Q vs Tesla M60

GRID P40-24Q
Popular choices:

Tesla M60
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID P40-24Q is positioned at rank 338 and the Tesla M60 is on rank 277, so the Tesla M60 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-24Q
Performance Per Dollar Tesla M60
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID P40-24Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla M60.
| Insight | GRID P40-24Q | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GRID P40-24Q offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GRID P40-24Q holds the technical lead. Priced at $200 (vs $250), it costs 20% less, resulting in a 26% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID P40-24Q | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+26%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($200) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P40-24Q and Tesla M60

GRID P40-24Q
The GRID P40-24Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,057 points.

Tesla M60
The Tesla M60 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,002 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P40-24Q scores 7,057 and the Tesla M60 reaches 7,002 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-24Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Tesla M60 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P40-24Q) vs 2,048 (Tesla M60). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-24Q) vs 4.825 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla M60). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | GRID P40-24Q | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,057 | 7,002 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 ×2 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB | 768 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P40-24Q | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GRID P40-24Q | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (GRID P40-24Q) vs 12.1 (Tesla M60). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.
| Feature | GRID P40-24Q | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (GRID P40-24Q) vs NVENC 2.0 (2x) (Tesla M60). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP7 vs PureVideo HD VP6 (2x). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID P40-24Q) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Tesla M60).
| Feature | GRID P40-24Q | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | NVENC 2.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP7 | PureVideo HD VP6 (2x) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P40-24Q draws 225W versus the Tesla M60's 300W — a 28.6% difference. The GRID P40-24Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-24Q) vs 350W (Tesla M60). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GRID P40-24Q | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W-25% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 31.4+35% | 23.3 |
Value Analysis
The GRID P40-24Q launched at $5699 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the Tesla M60 launched at $3000 and now averages $250. The GRID P40-24Q costs 20% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 35.3 (GRID P40-24Q) vs 28.0 (Tesla M60) — the GRID P40-24Q offers 26.1% better value.
| Feature | GRID P40-24Q | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5699 | $3000-47% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200-20% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.3+26% | 28.0 |
| Codename | GM204 | GM204 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #433 | #355 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















