GeForce GTX 1650 vs Arc Graphics 130V
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
Arc Graphics 130V
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 130V
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 74.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc Graphics 130V.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1650 | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+74.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-74.5%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | Xe² (2024) (3nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $250 for the Arc Graphics 130V, it costs 70% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 481.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1650 | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+481.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($75) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Arc Graphics 130V
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Arc Graphics 130V
The Arc Graphics 130V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 1850 MHz. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,510 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Arc Graphics 130V's 4,510 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 74.5%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Arc Graphics 130V uses Xe², both on 12 nm vs 3 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 7 (Arc Graphics 130V). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1850 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869+74% | 4,510 |
| Architecture | Turing | Xe² |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 3 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+12700% | 7 |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1850 MHz+11% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Arc Graphics 130V has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.2 (Arc Graphics 130V). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 130V). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 130V).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Arc Graphics 130V's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Arc Graphics 130V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Arc Graphics 130V). Power connectors: None vs Integrated. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 15W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Integrated |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9 | 300.7+187% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the Arc Graphics 130V launched at $300 and now averages $250. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 70% less ($175 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 18.0 (Arc Graphics 130V) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 482.8% better value. The Arc Graphics 130V is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-50% | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $75-70% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 104.9+483% | 18.0 |
| Codename | TU117 | Lunar Lake iGPU |
| Release | April 23 2019 | September 24 2024 |
| Ranking | #323 | #463 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1650 and Arc Graphics 130V
