GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs Arc Graphics 130V
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Arc Graphics 130V
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 130V
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 600.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (12 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc Graphics 130V.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+600.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-600.2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) | Xe² (2024) (3nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (285mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $590 (vs $250), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 196.7% better value per dollar than the Arc Graphics 130V.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+196.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($590) | ✅More affordable ($250) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Arc Graphics 130V
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Arc Graphics 130V
The Arc Graphics 130V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 1850 MHz. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,510 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Arc Graphics 130V's 4,510 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 600.2%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Arc Graphics 130V uses Xe², both on 4 nm vs 3 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 7 (Arc Graphics 130V). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 1850 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+600% | 4,510 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Xe² |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680+109614% | 7 |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+41% | 1850 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Arc Graphics 130V lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc Graphics 130V relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Arc Graphics 130V has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | Shared |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12.2 (Arc Graphics 130V). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 130V). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 130V).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Arc Graphics 130V's 15W — a 180% difference. The Arc Graphics 130V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 350W (Arc Graphics 130V). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 285mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 15W-95% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 350W-50% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 285mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8 | 300.7+171% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $590, while the Arc Graphics 130V launched at $300 and now averages $250. The Arc Graphics 130V costs 57.6% less ($340 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 18.0 (Arc Graphics 130V) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 197.2% better value. The Arc Graphics 130V is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $300-62% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $590 | $250-58% |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.5+197% | 18.0 |
| Codename | AD104 | Lunar Lake iGPU |
| Release | January 3 2023 | September 24 2024 |
| Ranking | #11 | #463 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Arc Graphics 130V
