GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce 9650M GT

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9650M GT

#669

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

7925%

#671

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

7184%

#672

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

7165%

#676

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

6515%

#677

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

6471%

#679

GeForce 9650M GT

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

100%

#680

GeForce 9650M GS

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

99%

#681

GeForce 8400 SE

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

99%

#682

GeForce 8400M GT

MSRP: $50|Avg: $30

98%

#683

Mobility Radeon HD 3410

MSRP: $49|Avg: $10

94%

#684

GeForce 9200M GS

MSRP: $100|Avg: $40

94%

#685

MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL

MSRP: $49|Avg: $10

89%

#686

GeForce 9300M GS

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

86%

#687

Mobility Radeon HD 2400

MSRP: $79|Avg: $1

83%

#688

GeForce 6150 LE

MSRP: $30|Avg: $10

80%

#689

Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2

MSRP: $449|Avg: $50

77%

#690

GeForce 9450

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

77%

#691

GeForce 9800 GX2

MSRP: $599|Avg: $75

74%

#692

GeForce 7900 GS

MSRP: $259|Avg: $50

74%

#693

MOBILITY RADEON X600

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

73%

#694

Mobility Radeon X2300 HD

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

72%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 9650M GT lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5643.8% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (4 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9650M GT.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce 9650M GT
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+5643.8%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-5643.8%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+300%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $25), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 1814.6% better value per dollar than the GeForce 9650M GT.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce 9650M GT
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+1814.6%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)	✅More affordable ($25)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

GeForce 9650M GT Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce 9650M GT

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce 9650M GT

The GeForce 9650M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 27 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 137 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce 9650M GT's 137 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 5643.8%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce 9650M GT uses Maxwell, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 640 (GeForce 9650M GT). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (GeForce 9650M GT). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1020 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce 9650M GT
G3D Mark Score	7,869+5644%	137
Architecture	Turing	Maxwell
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	896+40%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+128%	1.306 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+63%	1020 MHz
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	56+40%	40
L1 Cache	896 KB+180%	320 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce 9650M GT
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 9650M GT has 1 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (GeForce 9650M GT) — the GeForce 9650M GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce 9650M GT
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+300%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9650M GT). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce 9650M GT
DirectX	12+8%	11.1 (10_0)
OpenGL	4.6+39%	3.3
Max Displays	3+50%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs No NVENC (G96) (GeForce 9650M GT). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs PureVideo HD VP3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,WMV9 (GeForce 9650M GT).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce 9650M GT
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	No NVENC (G96)
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	PureVideo HD VP3
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,WMV9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce 9650M GT's 75W — a 0% difference. The GeForce 9650M GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (GeForce 9650M GT). Power connectors: None vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce 9650M GT
TDP	75W	75W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	Legacy
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80°C
Perf/Watt	104.9+5728%	1.8

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the GeForce 9650M GT launched at $100 and now averages $25. The GeForce 9650M GT costs 66.7% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 5.5 (GeForce 9650M GT) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 1807.3% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).