GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs GeForce 9650M GT

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

100%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

96%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

95%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

95%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

95%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

94%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

93%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

93%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

92%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

91%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

90%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

90%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

89%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

88%

#15

Radeon RX 6500 XT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $150

88%

#16

GeForce RTX 3070

MSRP: $499|Avg: $200

88%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9650M GT

#669

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

7925%

#671

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

7184%

#672

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

7165%

#676

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

6515%

#677

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

6471%

#679

GeForce 9650M GT

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

100%

#680

GeForce 9650M GS

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

99%

#681

GeForce 8400 SE

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

99%

#682

GeForce 8400M GT

MSRP: $50|Avg: $30

98%

#683

Mobility Radeon HD 3410

MSRP: $49|Avg: $10

94%

#684

GeForce 9200M GS

MSRP: $100|Avg: $40

94%

#685

MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL

MSRP: $49|Avg: $10

89%

#686

GeForce 9300M GS

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

86%

#687

Mobility Radeon HD 2400

MSRP: $79|Avg: $1

83%

#688

GeForce 6150 LE

MSRP: $30|Avg: $10

80%

#689

Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2

MSRP: $449|Avg: $50

77%

#690

GeForce 9450

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

77%

#691

GeForce 9800 GX2

MSRP: $599|Avg: $75

74%

#692

GeForce 7900 GS

MSRP: $259|Avg: $50

74%

#693

MOBILITY RADEON X600

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

73%

#694

Mobility Radeon X2300 HD

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

72%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 9650M GT lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 14726.3% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (8 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9650M GT.

Insight	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	GeForce 9650M GT
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+14726.3%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-14726.3%)
Longevity	🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $280 (vs $25), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 1223.8% better value per dollar than the GeForce 9650M GT.

Insight	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	GeForce 9650M GT
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+1223.8%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($280)	✅More affordable ($25)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Benchmark Check

GeForce 9650M GT Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and GeForce 9650M GT

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

GeForce 9650M GT

The GeForce 9650M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 27 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 137 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the GeForce 9650M GT's 137 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 14726.3%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the GeForce 9650M GT uses Maxwell, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 640 (GeForce 9650M GT). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (GeForce 9650M GT). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1020 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	GeForce 9650M GT
G3D Mark Score	20,312+14726%	137
Architecture	Ampere	Maxwell
Process Node	8 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	4864+660%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.2 TFLOPS+1140%	1.306 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+63%	1020 MHz
ROPs	80+400%	16
TMUs	152+280%	40
L1 Cache	4.8 MB+1448%	0.31 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce 9650M GT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	GeForce 9650M GT
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2.0	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 9650M GT has 1 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2 MB (GeForce 9650M GT) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	GeForce 9650M GT
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+700%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	448 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9650M GT). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	GeForce 9650M GT
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)+8%	11.1 (10_0)
OpenGL	4.6+39%	3.3
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs No NVENC (G96) (GeForce 9650M GT). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs PureVideo HD VP3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,WMV9 (GeForce 9650M GT).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	GeForce 9650M GT
Encoder	NVENC (Ampere)	No NVENC (G96)
Decoder	NVDEC (Ampere)	PureVideo HD VP3
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,WMV9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the GeForce 9650M GT's 75W — a 90.9% difference. The GeForce 9650M GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (GeForce 9650M GT). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	GeForce 9650M GT
TDP	200W	75W-63%
Recommended PSU	600W	350W-42%
Power Connector	8-pin	Legacy
Length	242mm	—
Height	112mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	101.6+5544%	1.8

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $280, while the GeForce 9650M GT launched at $100 and now averages $25. The GeForce 9650M GT costs 91.1% less ($255 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 72.5 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 5.5 (GeForce 9650M GT) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 1218.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).