GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX 760A

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 760A

#473

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

2207%

#475

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

2000%

#476

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

1995%

#480

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

1814%

#481

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

1802%

#483

GeForce GTX 760A

MSRP: $249|Avg: $40

100%

#484

Mobility Radeon HD 5470

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

98%

#485

Radeon R9 M270X

MSRP: $250|Avg: $40

98%

#486

Radeon R7 M260

MSRP: $110|Avg: $110

97%

#487

Mobility Radeon HD 5000 Serisi

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

97%

#488

Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $50

97%

#489

Radeon R7 A10-7800

MSRP: $155|Avg: $30

97%

#490

Radeon HD 8450G + 8670M Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

97%

#491

Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8670M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

96%

#492

Radeon HD 6450A

MSRP: $55|Avg: $15

96%

#493

Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

96%

#494

Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7600M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $50

95%

#495

Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $35

92%

#497

Radeon HD 8180

MSRP: $30|Avg: $5

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 760A lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 541.8% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 760A.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 760A
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+541.8%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-541.8%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+700%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $40), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 242.3% better value per dollar than the GeForce GTX 760A.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 760A
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+242.3%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)	✅More affordable ($40)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 760A Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce GTX 760A

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce GTX 760A

The GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 628 MHz to 657 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,226 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce GTX 760A's 1,226 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 541.8%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 760A uses Kepler, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 760A). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.009 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760A). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 657 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 760A
G3D Mark Score	7,869+542%	1,226
Architecture	Turing	Kepler
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	896+17%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+196%	1.009 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+153%	657 MHz
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	56	64+14%
L1 Cache	896 KB+1300%	64 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 760A
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 760A has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce GTX 760A) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 760A
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760A). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 760A
DirectX	12	12 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.4+17%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 760A). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 760A).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 760A
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	NVENC 1st Gen
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	PureVideo HD VP5
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 760A's 55W — a 30.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 760A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 760A). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 760A
TDP	75W	55W-27%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	1x 6-pin
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C-18%	85°C
Perf/Watt	104.9+370%	22.3

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the GeForce GTX 760A launched at $249 and now averages $40. The GeForce GTX 760A costs 46.7% less ($35 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 30.6 (GeForce GTX 760A) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 242.8% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).