GeForce RTX 4060
VS
GeForce GTX 760A

GeForce RTX 4060 vs GeForce GTX 760A

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060

2023Core: 1830 MHzBoost: 2460 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760A

2014Core: 628 MHzBoost: 657 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
111%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
107%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
105%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
105%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
105%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
104%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
103%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
103%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
102%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
101%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
100%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
100%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
98%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
98%
#15
Radeon RX 6500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $150
98%
#16
GeForce RTX 3070
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
97%
#17
Radeon RX 6700
MSRP: $379|Avg: $300
96%
#18
Radeon RX 6600 XT
MSRP: $379|Avg: $170
95%
#19
Radeon RX590 GME
MSRP: $173|Avg: $115
94%
#20
Radeon RX 6650 XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $230
94%
#21
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
92%
#22
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MSRP: $169|Avg: $179
92%
#23
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
MSRP: $249|Avg: $209
92%
#24
Radeon RX 6600 LE
MSRP: $329|Avg: $160
91%
#25
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
91%
#26
Radeon RX 7700 XT
MSRP: $449|Avg: $380
91%
#27
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $380
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 760A

#473
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
2207%
#475
2000%
#476
1995%
#480
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1814%
#481
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1802%
#483
GeForce GTX 760A
MSRP: $249|Avg: $40
100%
#484
Mobility Radeon HD 5470
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
98%
#485
Radeon R9 M270X
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
98%
#486
Radeon R7 M260
MSRP: $110|Avg: $110
97%
#487
97%
#488
97%
#489
Radeon R7 A10-7800
MSRP: $155|Avg: $30
97%
#490
Radeon HD 8450G + 8670M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
97%
#491
96%
#492
Radeon HD 6450A
MSRP: $55|Avg: $15
96%
#493
96%
#494
95%
#495
92%
#496
Radeon HD 8180
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce RTX 4060 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2014). The GeForce RTX 4060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 760A lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 4060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1494.5% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (8 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 760A.

InsightGeForce RTX 4060GeForce GTX 760A
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1494.5%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1494.5%)
Longevity
🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce RTX 4060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $299 (vs $40), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 113.3% better value per dollar than the GeForce GTX 760A.

InsightGeForce RTX 4060GeForce GTX 760A
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+113.3%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($299)
More affordable ($40)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and GeForce GTX 760A

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760A

The GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 628 MHz to 657 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,226 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the GeForce GTX 760A's 1,226 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 1494.5%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce GTX 760A uses Kepler, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 760A). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1.009 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760A). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 657 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060GeForce GTX 760A
G3D Mark Score
19,548+1494%
1,226
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Kepler
Process Node
5 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
3072+300%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
15.11 TFLOPS+1398%
1.009 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2460 MHz+274%
657 MHz
ROPs
48+200%
16
TMUs
96+50%
64
L1 Cache
3 MB+4900%
0.06 MB
L2 Cache
24 MB+9500%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 760A lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce GTX 760A relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060GeForce GTX 760A
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.0 (Native)
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 760A has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce GTX 760A) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060GeForce GTX 760A
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+1500%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
272 GB/s
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
24 MB+9500%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760A). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060GeForce GTX 760A
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 760A). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 760A).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060GeForce GTX 760A
Encoder
NVENC 8th gen
NVENC 1st Gen
Decoder
NVDEC 5th gen
PureVideo HD VP5
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the GeForce GTX 760A's 55W — a 70.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 760A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 760A). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060GeForce GTX 760A
TDP
115W
55W-52%
Recommended PSU
550W
350W-36%
Power Connector
8-pin
1x 6-pin
Length
240mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
73°C-14%
85°C
Perf/Watt
170.0+662%
22.3
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP and currently averages $299, while the GeForce GTX 760A launched at $249 and now averages $40. The GeForce GTX 760A costs 86.6% less ($259 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 30.6 (GeForce GTX 760A) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 113.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060GeForce GTX 760A
MSRP
$299
$249-17%
Avg Price (30d)
$299
$40-87%
Performance per Dollar
65.4+114%
30.6
Codename
AD107
GK106
Release
May 18 2023
March 17 2014
Ranking
#84
#813