GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX 780 Ti

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2013). The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 780 Ti lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 20.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 1650 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-20.3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+20.3%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+33.3%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 780 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $42 versus $75 for the GeForce GTX 1650, it costs 44% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 114.9% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+114.9%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)	✅More affordable ($42)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 780 Ti Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce GTX 780 Ti

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce GTX 780 Ti

The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,469 points. Launch price was $699.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce GTX 780 Ti's 9,469 — the GeForce GTX 780 Ti leads by 20.3%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 780 Ti uses Kepler, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,880 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780 Ti). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 928 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 780 Ti
G3D Mark Score	7,869	9,469+20%
Architecture	Turing	Kepler
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	896	2880+221%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	5.345 TFLOPS+79%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+79%	928 MHz
ROPs	32	48+50%
TMUs	56	240+329%
L1 Cache	896 KB+273%	240 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1.5 MB+50%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 780 Ti has 3 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) — a 162.5% advantage for the GeForce GTX 780 Ti. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 780 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 780 Ti
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+33%	3 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	336 GB/s+163%
Bus Width	128-bit	384-bit+200%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1.5 MB+50%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 780 Ti
DirectX	12	12
Vulkan	1.4+17%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 780 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC 1st gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	NVENC 1st gen
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	NVDEC 1st gen
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 780 Ti's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 600W (GeForce GTX 780 Ti). Power connectors: None vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 83°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 780 Ti
TDP	75W-70%	250W
Recommended PSU	300W-50%	600W
Power Connector	None	6-pin + 8-pin
Length	229mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-16%	83°C
Perf/Watt	104.9+177%	37.9

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the GeForce GTX 780 Ti launched at $699 and now averages $42. The GeForce GTX 780 Ti costs 44% less ($33 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 225.5 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 780 Ti offers 115% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2013).