GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce MX450
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
GeForce MX450
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX450
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 111.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce MX450.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+111.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-111.5%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $200 for the GeForce MX450, it costs 63% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 464.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+464.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($75) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce MX450
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
GeForce MX450
The GeForce MX450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,720 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce MX450's 3,720 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 111.5%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce MX450 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 896 (GeForce MX450). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce MX450). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1575 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869+112% | 3,720 |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 3.226 TFLOPS+8% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+6% | 1575 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 56 | 64+14% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce MX450 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 80 GB/s (GeForce MX450) — a 60% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1650. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s+60% | 80 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce MX450's 25W — a 100% difference. The GeForce MX450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (GeForce MX450). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 25W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9 | 148.8+42% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the GeForce MX450 launched at $250 and now averages $200. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 62.5% less ($125 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 18.6 (GeForce MX450) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 464% better value. The GeForce MX450 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-40% | $250 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $75-63% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 104.9+464% | 18.6 |
| Codename | TU117 | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | August 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #323 | #523 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce MX450
