GeForce RTX 3070 vs GeForce MX450
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
GeForce MX450
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX450
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 496% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce MX450.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+496%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-496%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $200 (vs $200), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 496% better value per dollar than the GeForce MX450.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+496%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and GeForce MX450
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
GeForce MX450
The GeForce MX450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,720 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the GeForce MX450's 3,720 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 496%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the GeForce MX450 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 896 (GeForce MX450). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce MX450). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1575 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+496% | 3,720 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+557% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+530% | 3.226 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+10% | 1575 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+200% | 32 |
| TMUs | 184+188% | 64 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce MX450 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce MX450 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 80 GB/s (GeForce MX450) — a 460% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+460% | 80 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the GeForce MX450's 25W — a 159.2% difference. The GeForce MX450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 350W (GeForce MX450). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 25W-89% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8 | 148.8+48% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the GeForce MX450 launched at $250 and now averages $200. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 110.9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 18.6 (GeForce MX450) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 496.2% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $250-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 110.9+496% | 18.6 |
| Codename | GA104 | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | August 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #63 | #523 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3070 and GeForce MX450
