GeForce GTX 1650
VS
GeForce PCX 5300

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce PCX 5300

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce PCX 5300

2025Core: 2017 MHzBoost: 2407 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce PCX 5300

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
72540%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
69690%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
68880%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
68760%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
68620%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
68230%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
67370%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
67120%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
66500%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
66320%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
65520%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
65380%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
64200%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
64160%
#361
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
80000%
#376
GeForce PCX 5300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
100%
#377
GeForce FX 5900
MSRP: $399|Avg: $20
90%
#378
GeForce FX 5600 Ultra
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
90%
#379
GeForce FX 5100
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
80%
#380
GeForce FX 5600
MSRP: $200|Avg: $10
70%
#381
GeForce FX 5600XT
MSRP: $129|Avg: $10
70%
#382
GeForce4 Ti 4200
MSRP: $199|Avg: $5
30%
#383
GeForce3 Ti 200
MSRP: $149|Avg: $49
30%
#384
GeForce4 Ti 4400
MSRP: $299|Avg: $49
20%
#385
GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
MSRP: $299|Avg: $30
20%
#386
GeForce4 MX 460
MSRP: $179|Avg: $15
20%
#387
GeForce4 Ti 4800
MSRP: $399|Avg: $40
20%
#388
GeForce4 Ti 4600
MSRP: $399|Avg: $40
20%
#389
RADEON 7500
MSRP: $199|Avg: $50
20%
#390
GeForce3 Ti 500
MSRP: $349|Avg: $49
10%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce PCX 5300 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2019). The GeForce PCX 5300 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 131050% higher G3D Mark score and 3100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce PCX 5300.

InsightGeForce GTX 1650GeForce PCX 5300
Performance
Leading raw performance (+131050%)
Lower raw frame rates (-131050%)
Longevity
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) (5nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+3100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $15), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 26130% better value per dollar than the GeForce PCX 5300.

InsightGeForce GTX 1650GeForce PCX 5300
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+26130%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)
More affordable ($15)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce PCX 5300

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

NVIDIA

GeForce PCX 5300

The GeForce PCX 5300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $1,999.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce PCX 5300's 6 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 131050%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce PCX 5300 uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 21,760 (GeForce PCX 5300). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce PCX 5300). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2407 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650GeForce PCX 5300
G3D Mark Score
7,869+131050%
6
Architecture
Turing
Blackwell 2.0
Process Node
12 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
896
21760+2329%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.984 TFLOPS
104.8 TFLOPS+3412%
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
2407 MHz+45%
ROPs
32
176+450%
TMUs
56
680+1114%
L1 Cache
0.88 MB
21.3 MB+2320%
L2 Cache
1 MB
96 MB+9500%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650GeForce PCX 5300
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce PCX 5300 has 128 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 3100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 96 MB (GeForce PCX 5300) — the GeForce PCX 5300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650GeForce PCX 5300
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+3100%
0.125 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
128 GB/s
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
96 MB+9500%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 9.0a (GeForce PCX 5300). Vulkan: 1.4 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650GeForce PCX 5300
DirectX
12+33%
9.0a
Vulkan
1.4
None
OpenGL
4.6+207%
1.5
Max Displays
3+50%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs None (GeForce PCX 5300). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs None.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650GeForce PCX 5300
Encoder
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
None
Decoder
NVDEC 4th gen
None
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce PCX 5300's 575W — a 153.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (GeForce PCX 5300). Power connectors: None vs Legacy. Card length: 229mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650GeForce PCX 5300
TDP
75W-87%
575W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
Legacy
Length
229mm
168mm
Height
111mm
100mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
70°C
70
Perf/Watt
104.9
0.0
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the GeForce PCX 5300 launched at $60 and now averages $15. The GeForce PCX 5300 costs 80% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.4 (GeForce PCX 5300) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 26125% better value. The GeForce PCX 5300 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650GeForce PCX 5300
MSRP
$149
$60-60%
Avg Price (30d)
$75
$15-80%
Performance per Dollar
104.9+26125%
0.4
Codename
TU117
GB202
Release
April 23 2019
January 30 2025
Ranking
#323
#3