GeForce GTX 1650
VS
Iris Xe Graphics G7

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Popular choices:

RTX 4060•RTX 3060•RTX 4060 Ti•RTX 3070•GTX 1650•RTX 3060 Ti•RTX 4070•RTX 3050•RX 7600•RTX 4070 Ti
VS
Intel

Iris Xe Graphics G7

2020

Popular choices:

RTX 4060•RTX 3060•RTX 4060 Ti•RTX 3070•GTX 1650•RTX 3060 Ti•RTX 4070•RTX 3050•RX 7600•RTX 4070 Ti

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce GTX 1650
75
7,869
+137.7%
brand logoGeForce GTX 880M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
brand logoGeForce GTX 960
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
brand logoGeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Iris Xe Graphics G7
30
3,311
0.0%
brand logoHD Graphics 630
brand logoIris Plus Graphics 645
brand logoIris Plus Graphics 950
brand logoUHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
brand logoUHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)
brand logoIris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
brand logoArc A530M
brand logoArc A580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Iris Xe Graphics G7

#61
GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)
MSRP: $800|Avg: $350
93%
#272
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
656%
#274
GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150
594%
#275
GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100
593%
#279
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
539%
#280
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
535%
#282
Iris Xe Graphics G7
MSRP: $200|Avg: $100
100%
#283
Radeon R9 M395
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
99%
#285
GeForce GT 755M SLI
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
99%
#286
GeForce GTX 950A
MSRP: $159|Avg: $30
99%
#288
Radeon 540X
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
97%
#289
GeForce 930MX
MSRP: $80|Avg: $25
96%
#291
GeForce MX250
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
96%
#292
Radeon 630
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
95%
#293
GeForce MX330
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
95%
#296
Radeon RX 780
MSRP: $499|Avg: $721
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 137.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Xe Graphics G7.

InsightGeForce GTX 1650Iris Xe Graphics G7
Performance
✅Leading raw performance (+137.7%)
❌Lower raw frame rates (-137.7%)
Longevity
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $100 for the Iris Xe Graphics G7, it costs 25% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 216.9% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GTX 1650Iris Xe Graphics G7
Cost Efficiency
✅Better overall value (+216.9%)
❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
✅More affordable ($75)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Iris Xe Graphics G7 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080p
low120 FPS
medium104 FPS
high82 FPS
ultra68 FPS
1440p
low87 FPS
medium79 FPS
high65 FPS
ultra54 FPS
4K
low36 FPS
medium32 FPS
high27 FPS
ultra21 FPS
Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080p
low149 FPS
medium119 FPS
high99 FPS
ultra74 FPS
1440p
low96 FPS
medium66 FPS
high53 FPS
ultra37 FPS
4K
low31 FPS
medium24 FPS
high21 FPS
ultra13 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p
low144 FPS
medium111 FPS
high87 FPS
ultra69 FPS
1440p
low75 FPS
medium59 FPS
high41 FPS
ultra31 FPS
4K
low30 FPS
medium23 FPS
high17 FPS
ultra14 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p
low149 FPS
medium119 FPS
high70 FPS
ultra40 FPS
1440p
low102 FPS
medium77 FPS
high41 FPS
ultra26 FPS
4K
low51 FPS
medium38 FPS
high21 FPS
ultra15 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080p
low322 FPS
medium283 FPS
high236 FPS
ultra177 FPS
1440p
low201 FPS
medium194 FPS
high162 FPS
ultra127 FPS
4K
low78 FPS
medium72 FPS
high64 FPS
ultra49 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080p
low149 FPS
medium119 FPS
high99 FPS
ultra74 FPS
1440p
low112 FPS
medium89 FPS
high74 FPS
ultra56 FPS
4K
low74 FPS
medium60 FPS
high50 FPS
ultra37 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080p
low243 FPS
medium213 FPS
high182 FPS
ultra162 FPS
1440p
low186 FPS
medium179 FPS
high160 FPS
ultra128 FPS
4K
low101 FPS
medium90 FPS
high64 FPS
ultra48 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080p
low112 FPS
medium98 FPS
high75 FPS
ultra54 FPS
1440p
low76 FPS
medium67 FPS
high50 FPS
ultra36 FPS
4K
low51 FPS
medium42 FPS
high25 FPS
ultra19 FPS
Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Iris Xe Graphics G7

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Iris Xe Graphics G7

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Iris Xe Graphics G7's 3,311 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 137.7%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 12 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 96 (Iris Xe Graphics G7).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Iris Xe Graphics G7
G3D Mark Score
7,869+138%
3,311
Architecture
Turing
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Process Node
12 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
896+833%
96
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Iris Xe Graphics G7
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Iris Xe Graphics G7
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
128 GB/s
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Iris Xe Graphics G7
DirectX
12
12.1
Vulkan
1.4+17%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs QuickSync (Iris Xe Graphics G7). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Iris Xe Graphics G7
Encoder
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
QuickSync
Decoder
NVDEC 4th gen
QuickSync
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
H.264,HEVC,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Iris Xe Graphics G7's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1W (Iris Xe Graphics G7). Power connectors: None vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Iris Xe Graphics G7
TDP
75W
30W-60%
Recommended PSU
300W
1W-100%
Power Connector
None
Integrated
Length
229mm
—
Height
111mm
—
Slots
2
—
Temp (Load)
70°C-18%
85°C
Perf/Watt
104.9
110.4+5%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 launched at $200 and now averages $100. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 25% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 33.1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 216.9% better value. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Iris Xe Graphics G7
MSRP
$149-26%
$200
Avg Price (30d)
$75-25%
$100
Performance per Dollar
104.9+217%
33.1
Codename
TU117
Tiger Lake Xe
Release
April 23 2019
August 15 2020
Ranking
#323
#493