GeForce GTX 1650 vs Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 299% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Xe Graphics MAX.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1650 | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+299%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-299%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $40), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 112.8% better value per dollar than the Iris Xe Graphics MAX.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1650 | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+112.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Iris Xe Graphics MAX
The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 31 2020. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1650 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,972 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Iris Xe Graphics MAX's 1,972 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 299%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Iris Xe Graphics MAX uses Generation 12.1, both on 12 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 768 (Iris Xe Graphics MAX). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2.534 TFLOPS (Iris Xe Graphics MAX). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1650 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869+299% | 1,972 |
| Architecture | Turing | Generation 12.1 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+17% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS+18% | 2.534 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1650 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+33% | 24 |
| TMUs | 56+17% | 48 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Xe Graphics MAX has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.1 (Iris Xe Graphics MAX). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+40% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs QuickSync (Iris Xe Graphics MAX). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Iris Xe Graphics MAX).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | QuickSync |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Iris Xe Graphics MAX's 25W — a 100% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1W (Iris Xe Graphics MAX). Power connectors: None vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 25W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | None | Integrated |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+33% | 78.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the Iris Xe Graphics MAX launched at $55 and now averages $40. The Iris Xe Graphics MAX costs 46.7% less ($35 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 49.3 (Iris Xe Graphics MAX) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 112.8% better value. The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | $55-63% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $75 | $40-47% |
| Performance per Dollar | 104.9+113% | 49.3 |
| Codename | TU117 | DG1 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | October 31 2020 |
| Ranking | #323 | #685 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1650 and Iris Xe Graphics MAX
