GeForce RTX 4070 vs Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:
Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070
Performance Per Dollar Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1265.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (12 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Xe Graphics MAX.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1265.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1265.1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (304mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Iris Xe Graphics MAX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $550 for the GeForce RTX 4070, it costs 93% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 0.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+0.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($550) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Iris Xe Graphics MAX
The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 31 2020. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1650 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,972 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Iris Xe Graphics MAX's 1,972 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 1265.1%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Iris Xe Graphics MAX uses Generation 12.1, both on 5 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 768 (Iris Xe Graphics MAX). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2.534 TFLOPS (Iris Xe Graphics MAX). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1650 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+1265% | 1,972 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Generation 12.1 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+667% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+1050% | 2.534 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+50% | 1650 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+167% | 24 |
| TMUs | 184+283% | 48 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Iris Xe Graphics MAX lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Iris Xe Graphics MAX relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Xe Graphics MAX has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.1 (Iris Xe Graphics MAX). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+30% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs QuickSync (Iris Xe Graphics MAX). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Iris Xe Graphics MAX).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | QuickSync |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | QuickSync |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Iris Xe Graphics MAX's 25W — a 155.6% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1W (Iris Xe Graphics MAX). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 25W-88% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 304mm | — |
| Height | 137mm | — |
| Slots | 3 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+71% | 78.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $550, while the Iris Xe Graphics MAX launched at $55 and now averages $40. The Iris Xe Graphics MAX costs 92.7% less ($510 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 48.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 49.3 (Iris Xe Graphics MAX) — the Iris Xe Graphics MAX offers 0.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $55-91% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $550 | $40-93% |
| Performance per Dollar | 48.9 | 49.3 |
| Codename | AD104 | DG1 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | October 31 2020 |
| Ranking | #32 | #685 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4070 and Iris Xe Graphics MAX
