GeForce GTX 1650 vs P102-100

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar P102-100

#87

A10G

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2000

99%

#88

Tesla T4

MSRP: $1880|Avg: $1000

98%

#89

Tesla M40 24GB

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $120

97%

#90

Quadro P5000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $400

93%

#91

RTX PRO 6000

MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565

91%

#186

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

2686%

#201

P102-100

MSRP: $600|Avg: $80

100%

#203

Quadro FX 2700

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

99%

#206

FirePro V3900

MSRP: $119|Avg: $30

96%

#207

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B

MSRP: $119|Avg: $89

96%

#208

Tesla K8

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100

93%

#210

GRID K240Q

MSRP: $500|Avg: $40

92%

#211

FirePro M4150

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

92%

#212

FirePro V4900

MSRP: $200|Avg: $47

92%

#213

GRID K160Q

MSRP: $125|Avg: $30

91%

#215

Quadro

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50

91%

#216

FirePro W5000

MSRP: $599|Avg: $40

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 138.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the P102-100.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	P102-100
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+138.4%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-138.4%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $80 for the P102-100, it costs 6% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 154.3% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	P102-100
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+154.3%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($75)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

P102-100 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and P102-100

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

P102-100

The P102-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1582 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 3200 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,301 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the P102-100's 3,301 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 138.4%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the P102-100 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3,200 (P102-100). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 10.77 TFLOPS (P102-100). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1683 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	P102-100
G3D Mark Score	7,869+138%	3,301
Architecture	Turing	Pascal
Process Node	12 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	896	3200+257%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	10.77 TFLOPS+261%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	1683 MHz+1%
ROPs	32	80+150%
TMUs	56	200+257%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	1.2 MB+36%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2.5 MB+150%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	P102-100
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the P102-100 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2.5 MB (P102-100) — the P102-100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	P102-100
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	2.5 MB+150%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12_1 (P102-100). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	P102-100
DirectX	12	12_1
Max Displays	3	0

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the P102-100's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (P102-100). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	P102-100
TDP	75W-70%	250W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	267mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9+695%	13.2

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the P102-100 launched at $600 and now averages $80. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 6.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 41.3 (P102-100) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 154% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).