GeForce RTX 3060 vs P102-100
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:
P102-100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060
Performance Per Dollar P102-100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 414.8% higher G3D Mark score and 500% more VRAM (12 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the P102-100.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3060 | P102-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+414.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-414.8%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere / 8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $289 (vs $80), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 42.5% better value per dollar than the P102-100.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3060 | P102-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+42.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($289) | ✅More affordable ($80) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and P102-100
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.
P102-100
The P102-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1582 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 3200 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,301 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the P102-100's 3,301 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 414.8%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the P102-100 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 3,200 (P102-100). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 10.77 TFLOPS (P102-100). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1683 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | P102-100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995+415% | 3,301 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+12% | 3200 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+18% | 10.77 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+6% | 1683 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 80+67% |
| TMUs | 112 | 200+79% |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+192% | 1.2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+20% | 2.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The P102-100 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | P102-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the P102-100 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 2.5 MB (P102-100) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | P102-100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+500% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+20% | 2.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12_1 (P102-100). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | P102-100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the P102-100's 250W — a 38.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 350W (P102-100). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | P102-100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W-32% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+658% | 13.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP and currently averages $289, while the P102-100 launched at $600 and now averages $80. The P102-100 costs 72.3% less ($209 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 58.8 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 41.3 (P102-100) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 42.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | P102-100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-45% | $600 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $289 | $80-72% |
| Performance per Dollar | 58.8+42% | 41.3 |
| Codename | GA106 | GP102 |
| Release | January 12 2021 | February 12 2018 |
| Ranking | #114 | #560 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3060 and P102-100
