GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon HD 8250

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8250

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

1711%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

1644%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

1625%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

1622%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

1618%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

1609%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

1589%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

1583%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

1568%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

1564%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

1545%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

1542%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

1514%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

1513%

#235

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

1887%

#250

Radeon HD 8250

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

100%

#251

Radeon HD 3300

MSRP: $30|Avg: $5

100%

#253

Radeon R5 220

MSRP: $35|Avg: $15

99%

#254

Radeon HD 7350

MSRP: $40|Avg: $10

97%

#255

GeForce GTX 285

MSRP: $359|Avg: $30

97%

#256

Radeon HD 7570

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

96%

#257

Radeon HD 6380G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

95%

#258

Radeon HD 4550

MSRP: $59|Avg: $15

94%

#259

RADEON HD7450

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

94%

#260

GeForce GT 330

MSRP: $99|Avg: $30

94%

#262

Radeon HD 7340G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

92%

#263

Radeon HD 8210E

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

92%

#264

Radeon 535DX

MSRP: $200|Avg: $40

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2012). The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 8250 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3611.8% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8250.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 8250
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+3611.8%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-3611.8%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+700%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $50), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 2374.5% better value per dollar than the Radeon HD 8250.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 8250
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+2374.5%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)	✅More affordable ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Radeon HD 8250 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon HD 8250

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon HD 8250

The Radeon HD 8250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 212 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon HD 8250's 212 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 3611.8%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon HD 8250 uses GCN 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,024 (Radeon HD 8250). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8250). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 8250
G3D Mark Score	7,869+3612%	212
Architecture	Turing	GCN 1.0
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	896	1024+14%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+69%	1.761 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+67%	1000 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	56	64+14%
L1 Cache	896 KB+250%	256 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 8250
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8250 has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 8250) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 8250
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 8250's 130W — a 53.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8250). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon HD 8250
TDP	75W-42%	130W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	1x 6-pin
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9+6456%	1.6

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the Radeon HD 8250 launched at $50 and now averages $50. The Radeon HD 8250 costs 33.3% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4.2 (Radeon HD 8250) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 2397.6% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2012).