GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs Radeon HD 8250
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 8250
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8250
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is significantly newer (2023 vs 2012). The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 8250 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 14795.3% higher G3D Mark score and 2300% more VRAM (12 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8250.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon HD 8250 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+14795.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-14795.3%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (285mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $590 (vs $50), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 1162.3% better value per dollar than the Radeon HD 8250.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon HD 8250 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1162.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($590) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon HD 8250
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Radeon HD 8250
The Radeon HD 8250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 212 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Radeon HD 8250's 212 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 14795.3%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon HD 8250 uses GCN 1.0, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 1,024 (Radeon HD 8250). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8250). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon HD 8250 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+14795% | 212 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680+650% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS+2177% | 1.761 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+161% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+150% | 32 |
| TMUs | 240+275% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB+2900% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+9500% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon HD 8250 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon HD 8250 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon HD 8250 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8250 has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 2300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 8250) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon HD 8250 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+2300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+9500% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Radeon HD 8250's 130W — a 74.7% difference. The Radeon HD 8250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8250). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon HD 8250 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 130W-54% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 350W-50% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 285mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8+6825% | 1.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $590, while the Radeon HD 8250 launched at $50 and now averages $50. The Radeon HD 8250 costs 91.5% less ($540 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 4.2 (Radeon HD 8250) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 1173.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon HD 8250 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $50-94% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $590 | $50-92% |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.5+1174% | 4.2 |
| Codename | AD104 | Pitcairn |
| Release | January 3 2023 | March 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #11 | #503 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon HD 8250
