GeForce GTX 1650 vs RADEON IGP 320

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON IGP 320

#409

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

369325%

#424

RADEON IGP 320

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

100%

#425

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

50%

#426

Quadro FX 2000

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $40

25%

#427

GRID V100-8Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000

0%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 196625% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON IGP 320.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	RADEON IGP 320
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+196625%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-196625%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+700%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $20), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 52360% better value per dollar than the RADEON IGP 320.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	RADEON IGP 320
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+52360%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)	✅More affordable ($20)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

RADEON IGP 320 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and RADEON IGP 320

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

RADEON IGP 320

The RADEON IGP 320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 4 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the RADEON IGP 320's 4 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 196625%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the RADEON IGP 320 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4,608 (RADEON IGP 320). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 20.28 TFLOPS (RADEON IGP 320). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2200 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RADEON IGP 320
G3D Mark Score	7,869+196625%	4
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	896	4608+414%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	20.28 TFLOPS+580%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	2200 MHz+32%
ROPs	32	128+300%
TMUs	56	288+414%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	1 MB+14%
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RADEON IGP 320
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the RADEON IGP 320 has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4 MB (RADEON IGP 320) — the RADEON IGP 320 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RADEON IGP 320
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the RADEON IGP 320's 300W — a 120% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (RADEON IGP 320). Power connectors: None vs Legacy.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RADEON IGP 320
TDP	75W-75%	300W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	Legacy
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the RADEON IGP 320 launched at $100 and now averages $20. The RADEON IGP 320 costs 73.3% less ($55 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.2 (RADEON IGP 320) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 52350% better value. The RADEON IGP 320 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).