GeForce GTX 1650 vs RADEON X700 PRO

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON X700 PRO

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

17271%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

16593%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

16400%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

16371%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

16338%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

16245%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

16040%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

15981%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

15833%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

15790%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

15600%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

15567%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

15286%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

15276%

#343

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

19048%

#358

RADEON X700 PRO

MSRP: $179|Avg: $30

100%

#360

GeForce 6500

MSRP: $100|Avg: $5

90%

#361

RADEON X800 GT

MSRP: $249|Avg: $15

81%

#362

GeForce 6600

MSRP: $270|Avg: $10

76%

#363

RADEON 9550

MSRP: $129|Avg: $30

64%

#364

GeForce FX 5700LE

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

60%

#365

Radeon X1600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $49

60%

#366

GeForce PCX 5750

MSRP: $150|Avg: $15

55%

#367

GeForce FX 5700

MSRP: $199|Avg: $15

50%

#368

RADEON X800 XL

MSRP: $349|Avg: $15

48%

#369

RADEON X800 XT

MSRP: $499|Avg: $20

48%

#370

RADEON 9600 XT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $15

43%

#371

RADEON X800 PRO

MSRP: $399|Avg: $15

38%

#372

GeForce FX 5200LE

MSRP: $43|Avg: $25

38%

#373

GeForce FX 5200SE

MSRP: $99|Avg: $10

29%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 10253.9% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (4 GB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON X700 PRO.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	RADEON X700 PRO
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+10253.9%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-10253.9%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (5nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+1500%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $30), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 4041.6% better value per dollar than the RADEON X700 PRO.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	RADEON X700 PRO
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+4041.6%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)	✅More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

RADEON X700 PRO Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and RADEON X700 PRO

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

RADEON X700 PRO

The RADEON X700 PRO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 27 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1287 MHz to 2245 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 76 points. Launch price was $549.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the RADEON X700 PRO's 76 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 10253.9%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the RADEON X700 PRO uses RDNA 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 5,120 (RADEON X700 PRO). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 45.98 TFLOPS (RADEON X700 PRO). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2245 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RADEON X700 PRO
G3D Mark Score	7,869+10254%	76
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	12 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	896	5120+471%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	45.98 TFLOPS+1441%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	2245 MHz+35%
ROPs	32	160+400%
TMUs	56	320+471%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	2.5 MB+184%
L2 Cache	1 MB	6 MB+500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RADEON X700 PRO
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the RADEON X700 PRO has 256 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 6 MB (RADEON X700 PRO) — the RADEON X700 PRO has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RADEON X700 PRO
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+1500%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	6 MB+500%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 9_0b (RADEON X700 PRO). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RADEON X700 PRO
DirectX	12+33%	9_0b
Max Displays	3+50%	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the RADEON X700 PRO's 260W — a 110.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (RADEON X700 PRO). Power connectors: None vs Legacy. Card length: 229mm vs 170mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RADEON X700 PRO
TDP	75W-71%	260W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	Legacy
Length	229mm	170mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9+34867%	0.3

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the RADEON X700 PRO launched at $179 and now averages $30. The RADEON X700 PRO costs 60% less ($45 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2.5 (RADEON X700 PRO) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 4096% better value. The RADEON X700 PRO is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).