GeForce RTX 3050 8GB vs RADEON X700 PRO
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:
RADEON X700 PRO
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X700 PRO
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 16393.4% higher G3D Mark score and 3100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON X700 PRO.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | RADEON X700 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+16393.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-16393.4%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $209 (vs $30), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 2267.5% better value per dollar than the RADEON X700 PRO.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | RADEON X700 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2267.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($209) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and RADEON X700 PRO
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.
RADEON X700 PRO
The RADEON X700 PRO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 27 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1287 MHz to 2245 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 76 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB scores 12,535 versus the RADEON X700 PRO's 76 — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB leads by 16393.4%. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is built on Ampere while the RADEON X700 PRO uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 5,120 (RADEON X700 PRO). Raw compute: 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 45.98 TFLOPS (RADEON X700 PRO). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 2245 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 80 (RADEON X700 PRO) with 80 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | RADEON X700 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,535+16393% | 76 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 5120+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.098 TFLOPS | 45.98 TFLOPS+405% |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz | 2245 MHz+26% |
| ROPs | 32 | 160+400% |
| TMUs | 80 | 320+300% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 2.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 80+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The RADEON X700 PRO relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | RADEON X700 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RADEON X700 PRO has 256 MB. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 3100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 6 MB (RADEON X700 PRO) — the RADEON X700 PRO has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | RADEON X700 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+3100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 9_0b (RADEON X700 PRO). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | RADEON X700 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate+33% | 9_0b |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB draws 130W versus the RADEON X700 PRO's 260W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 350W (RADEON X700 PRO). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Legacy. Card length: 242mm vs 170mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | RADEON X700 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-50% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Legacy |
| Length | 242mm | 170mm |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 66°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 96.4+32033% | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $209, while the RADEON X700 PRO launched at $179 and now averages $30. The RADEON X700 PRO costs 85.6% less ($179 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 60.0 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 2.5 (RADEON X700 PRO) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 2300% better value. The RADEON X700 PRO is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | RADEON X700 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $179-28% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $209 | $30-86% |
| Performance per Dollar | 60.0+2300% | 2.5 |
| Codename | GA106 | Navi 31 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | July 27 2023 |
| Ranking | #211 | #29 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and RADEON X700 PRO
