GeForce GTX 1650 vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar RTX 4000 Ada Generation

#49

RTX 2000E Ada Generation

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

127%

#50

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1750

125%

#51

RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell

MSRP: $2399|Avg: $2015

123%

#52

RTX A1000

MSRP: $749|Avg: $500

120%

#54

Radeon Pro 5700

MSRP: $799|Avg: $250

119%

#55

Quadro P4000

MSRP: $815|Avg: $290

117%

#57

Quadro RTX 3000

MSRP: $800|Avg: $891

113%

#58

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1700

110%

#59

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

MSRP: $999|Avg: $150

106%

#60

Radeon Pro WX 8200

MSRP: $999|Avg: $350

105%

#62

RTX A4500

MSRP: $1699|Avg: $800

103%

#63

RTX 4500 Ada Generation

MSRP: $2250|Avg: $2000

103%

#64

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1547

100%

#65

RTX A4000H

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $927

98%

#66

Radeon PRO W7800

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200

90%

#67

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1450

86%

#70

Radeon PRO W6800

MSRP: $2249|Avg: $2249

75%

#72

Quadro P4200

MSRP: $1200|Avg: $110

72%

#74

RTX 5000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $4000|Avg: $4095

63%

#75

Radeon Pro Vega II

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1800

59%

#76

Radeon PRO W7900

MSRP: $3999|Avg: $3500

59%

#77

Radeon Pro VII

MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1400

58%

#78

Quadro RTX 5000

MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692

56%

#79

Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)

MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692

56%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 205.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 1650 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX 4000 Ada Generation
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-205.6%)	✅Leading raw performance (+205.6%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	🎮 High Capacity (2 GB)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $1,547 for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation, it costs 95% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 575% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX 4000 Ada Generation
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+575%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($75)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,547)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and RTX 4000 Ada Generation

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,046 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 24,046 — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation leads by 205.6%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 26.73 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1560 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX 4000 Ada Generation
G3D Mark Score	7,869	24,046+206%
Architecture	Turing	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	12 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	896	6144+586%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	26.73 TFLOPS+796%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+7%	1560 MHz
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	56	192+243%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	6 MB+582%
L2 Cache	1 MB	48 MB+4700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX 4000 Ada Generation
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	DLSS 3.5
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	DLSS 3.0 (Native)
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 360 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — a 181.3% advantage for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation. Bus width: 128-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX 4000 Ada Generation
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6 ECC
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	360 GB/s+181%
Bus Width	128-bit	160-bit+25%
L2 Cache	1 MB	48 MB+4700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX 4000 Ada Generation
DirectX	12	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 8th Gen NVENC (3x) (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX 4000 Ada Generation
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	8th Gen NVENC (3x)
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 70W — a 6.9% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 750W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: None vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX 4000 Ada Generation
TDP	75W	70W-7%
Recommended PSU	300W-60%	750W
Power Connector	None	1x 8-pin
Length	229mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80°C
Perf/Watt	104.9	343.5+227%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation launched at $1999 and now averages $1547. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 95.2% less ($1472 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 15.5 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 576.8% better value. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).